2006-11-20 16:26:37 · 6 answers · asked by Brittany G 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Okay silly me I thought people knew what this was.
http://www.library.cornell.edu/colldev/mideast/libera.htm
2006-11-20 16:50:23 · update #1
good question, because american's don't know history and you know the phrase, the those who don't learn from the past are condemned to repeat it.
2006-11-20 16:33:39 · answer #1 · answered by john e 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, I think the Iraq war would have gone ahead even if Gore was president.
2006-11-21 01:48:47 · answer #2 · answered by michinoku2001 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Who disregards it! We had him blockaded and cut off! There is nothing in the act that justifies a military invasion or removal!
It is Ironic that Bush has done some of the same things Saddam and the bit about the Iran war was particularly amusing as that IS WHY WE PUT HIM IN POWER! DUH!!!
2006-11-21 00:36:58 · answer #3 · answered by cantcu 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Because it's existence embarrasses them by pointing out their hypocrisy.
2006-11-21 00:32:40 · answer #4 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
WTF??! Iraq was liberated, I was there or shortly there after...It wasn't 1998....I was still in School then........ Clinton sure as hell didn't do it....
Put out the joint, Finish your 40, and rejoin reality....
2006-11-21 00:36:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
For those that care to read.
2006-11-21 00:41:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋