Garrard, hes a solid QB. He's more mobile, and isnt just a pocket passer but can break a tackle every once and awhile as shown in the NY Giants game and gain a couple a yards. They migh trade leftwich to a team in need of a QB for a first round pick or a WR
2006-11-20 17:25:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by jtranman421 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Both Leftwich and Garrard are pretty equal as far as skills go, although Leftwich is a little better. But the big thing is that Jacksonbille can get a lot more for Leftwich than they can for Garrard. Honestly, if I were the Jaguars GM, I'd try to work out a deal with Detroit and try to get a second or third round pick and send Leftwich to the Lions. Garrard can be the starter, and the Jags could use the early pick on a big-play talent at wide receiver to go with Matt Jones and Reggie Williams. Maybe Calvin Johnson could slip through the cracks to them in the second round.
2006-11-21 01:46:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by heluvajobu 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd keep Garrard, Leftwich costs too much for a player that is always injured.
2006-11-21 10:01:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by stan l 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
id go with garrard Hes hella more mobile. beter management. trade leftwich and pick up a Good reciever.
2006-11-21 01:14:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by Oakland Please, Just Win Baby! 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Leftwich might be gone for the season. Both of these guys should be starters though. One of them needs to go at the end of the year. Plain and simple.
2006-11-21 00:17:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Frankie Franko 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Leftwich, he may have been in the league longer, but how could Gerrard miss a Center pass and then settle for a punt (against Giants)?
2006-11-21 08:44:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Lex T 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
They go with Garrard and try and free up some salary cap space but by then Garrard's agent will be trying to re-negotiate the contract.
Leftwich...........well he goes where all washed up quarterbacks go.....Oakland......hahahaha
2006-11-21 00:18:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by TheTruthHurts 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Leftwich earned it and demonstrated his qualification.
2006-11-21 00:25:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by Beejee 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think they will go with Garrard, or they are showcasing him for trade bait.
2006-11-21 00:22:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by Bignizz66 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
trade garrard keep leftwich
he has potential to be great
2006-11-21 00:16:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by LuCKyNUmBeRShaDY 2
·
0⤊
0⤋