This person is Saddam Hussein. Should we go to war with a man who let us search only certain areas of the country for nuclear weapons. A man who said he got rid of nuclear weapons and gave no proof he did ?
2006-11-20 16:10:25 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
It's nice to see someone gets it. Not to mention aiding and hiding known terrorists.
2006-11-20 16:13:39 · answer #1 · answered by dakota29575 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
What proof do you have? What proof does America have? They have been there for so long, what have they got to show the world?
Why are the people of Iraq not complaining? How does it matter to you if Iraq has nuclear weapons? They have not used nuclear weapons against any other country. Americans have used chemical weapons against the civilians in Iraq. Why has America not searched the rest of Iraq if they feel there still are nuclear weapons hidden somewhere?
Man, collect the facts first before posting such questions. You should do some research before you ask people such questions.
2006-11-20 16:16:57 · answer #2 · answered by Vas 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
part of the 1991 peace agreement with Iraq was that Iraq would cut their troop level way down. In good faith Iraq did, what happened 10 years later was that they had no troops to defend their country with. This points to that Iraq did not want to be invaded and would adhere to sanctions.
Also many Iraqi's want the Americans to go.
In the last 30 years Iraq has never had a terrorist event in their country. Guess who was in power all this while?
2006-11-20 16:28:47 · answer #3 · answered by john e 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
NO NO NO the feds should not try to control the world. we should not sacrifice our young men and women to further there ambitions.My God in heaven, we must stop this trying to police the world business. there neighbors should handle that, if they don't, then the hell with it. we should take care of Americans . and not kill a half million Innocent people in Iraq so far, to avenge two million killed, that's madness.those people have warred with each other all the time of the millenniums. what about the six million native Brazilians murdered so for,? theres only about 200.000 left in the jungles. what about all the 100s of 1000s of people being murdered in Africa.?the feds just have here own interests,and agenda. it doesn't have anything to do with humanity. its business,as usual. Bush made up so much of all that to go to war, you think he came up with it all on his won? he is being controlled by special interests, you are just one of the many sheeple in this country. believe the lies. if you must, the truth is hard to swallow
2006-11-20 16:27:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
how on earth do you estimate he killed 2 million innocent people. Saddam have been in power since 1979 ........ true he is a dictator ....... even after two decade of us and UN sanction, he is still in power because he have the majority support of his people. he is ruthless ........ you need to be to keep all the warring factions and the religious zealots in check ......... A TASK HE SUCCEEDED IN, ADMIRABLY!
the first gulf war have turned their military into a lame duck ........ it can no longer harm anyone or defend itself ....... hence the charade of nuclear weapons and wmd to keep its enemies guessing but the us have sophisticated spy equipments to have ever fall for this.
Iraq is the only Mideast country that al qaeda and Islamic fundamentalism haven't got a foothold in ....... THANKS LARGELY TO SADDAM. the us invasion turned Iraq into a recruitment ground for terrorists ......... THANKS LARGELY TO THAT MORON. only a repug die-hard can justify this war after all the facts is being revealed.
2006-11-20 16:31:53 · answer #5 · answered by AlfRed E nEuMaN 4 preSIDent 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Um... have you ever been paying interest in any respect? We DID circulate to conflict, and final time I checked, old Saddam substitute into sitting in detention center. even if, the blood on his palms is the comparable blood on ours. who's right and who's erroneous? Oh, and related to the WMD's. They havent been got here upon because of the fact they arent there. end clinging so desperately to the final ultimate shreds of the lies you have been fed.
2016-11-25 22:11:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Taking out the Baathists was the morally responsible thing to do.
2006-11-20 16:40:48 · answer #7 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
their is no proof that;
1. he ever had them to begin with and.....
2. he ever had anything to get rid of
P.S.
The 2 million killed, were not American's.... What ever happen'd to mind your own business? Maybe we should!!!!
2006-11-20 16:17:12 · answer #8 · answered by polecatisme 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
well we invaded and still no wmd's!!!the man was no more guilty of things leaders in this country hasn't done.it was an unjustified attack the man did nothing to us.are you going to kill your neighbor cause you thing he stole something out of your yard?
2006-11-20 16:17:28 · answer #9 · answered by jgmafb 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
where's the proof he did not?
2006-11-20 16:15:15 · answer #10 · answered by mstrywmn 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋