Using the quotient rule,
log(2x-1) - log(x-3)=1
log((2x-1)/(x-3)) = 1
Then change to exponential form:
10^1 = (2x-1)/(x-3)
then solve:
10(x-3)=2x-1
10x-30=2x-1
8x=29
x=29/8
2006-11-20 13:10:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Melody 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
you may alter it out of log type to e35c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c70ponent type. The "little" quantity will advance into your base. What that's comparable to will advance into your e35c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c70ponent. the different quantity would be what that's now equivalent to. So... log35c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c70 36 = 35c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c7035c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c7035c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c70 will advance into 35c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c7035c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c7035c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c7035c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c7035c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c7035c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c7035c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c70 = 36 To get rid of a fractional e35c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c70ponent, strengthen the two facets to the reciprocal 35c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c70or flip35c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c70 skill. [35c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c7035c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c7035c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c7035c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c7035c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c7035c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c7035c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c70] x^(a million/2) 35c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c7035c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c7035c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c7035c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c7035c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c70 = 36 x^(a million/2) 35c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c7035c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c7035c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c7035c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c7035c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c70 x^(a million/2) = 35c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c7035c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c7096. enable's do the comparable element with the different equation. log3 x^(a million/2) = 35c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c7035c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c7035c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c70 will advance into 3 x^(a million/2) 35c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c7035c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c7035c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c7035c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c7035c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c70 = x^(a million/2) on account that x^(a million/2) is on my own, this one is largely leaving it on my own, switching it to root type, or changing it to an appro35c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c70imate decimal. 3 x^(a million/2) 35c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c7035c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c7035c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c7035c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c7035c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c70 = squarert of three = appro35c66a72bfbcff9f2d38d574768c9c70. x^(a million/2).seventy 3. sturdy luck!
2016-12-10 12:46:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
x must be > 3
log(2x-1)-log(x-3)=1
<=> log[(2x-1)/(x-3)] = log 10
<=> 2x-1 = 10(x-3)
<=> 8x = 29 <=> x = 29/8 > 3
then the root is x = 29/8
2006-11-20 13:56:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by James Chan 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
One property of logs says if you take the log of a fraction, you can split it into 2 separate logs with a minus sign separating them.
For example: log(a/b) = log(a) - log(b)
This property works in reverse as well. So for your problem, we combine the 2 log terms on the left hand side into one log expression.
log(2x-1) - log(x-3) = log((2x-1)/(x-3))
Which is equal to 1. log((2x-1)/(x-3)) = 1
Now we need to change this into exponential form to get the x's by itself withought log in our way.
log expressions have base 10, so we can change log((2x-1)/(x-3)) = 1 into 10^1 = (2x-1)/(x-3)
Now we can simplify.
First by cross multiplication we get 10(x-3) = 2x-1
Distribute the 10 to get 10x - 30 = 2x - 1
Subtract 2x from both sides to get 8x - 30 = -1
Now add 30 to both sides to get 8x = 29
Divide both sides by 8 to get x = 29/8
Which is our answer.
P.S. It is a good idea to plug this back into the equation to check.
2006-11-20 13:15:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by pecosbill2000 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
log(2x - 1) - log(x - 3) = 1
log((2x - 1)/(x - 3)) = 1
(2x - 1)/(x - 3) = 10^1
2x - 1 = 10x - 30
-8x = -29
x = (29/8)
2006-11-20 16:09:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by Sherman81 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
The 29/8 answer is correct. However, when doing these types of equations, ALWAYS check your answer to ensure that your proposed solution doesn't cause a negative logarithm (These don't, but future questions might).
2006-11-20 14:17:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
use your scientific calculator. if you don't have one then i am sorry because i don't know how to solve.
2006-11-20 13:16:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
29/8....or, 3.625
2006-11-20 13:10:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Ryan 2
·
0⤊
1⤋