Is Wikipedia a trustworthy site for students to use?

Answer 1

It's ok but you have to remember that anyone can edit anything in it, although Wiki does try to catch untruths. It would be ok for a starter but I would research further on a topic to make sure Wiki was accurate.

Answer 2

Let me say this, I am an admin on Wikipedia, I likely spend more time on it then many users here and I wouldn't trust it solely as a reference source on a term paper. Nor would I trust any one source. Wikipedia has citations on a lot of articles, use them. Encyclopedia's are starting points, not a one stop shop for information. Wikipedia is not the be all and end all (yet anyways)

Answer 3

A recent analysis compared Wikipedia to Encyclopedia Brittanica and found their accuracy equivalent. Not everyone can edit Wikipedia entries (that's the way it started, but it is now controlled). Most entries contain links to other references for support. I have yet to find an error in any entry for a scientific subject. Where you have the most problem is in controversial subjects such as global warming, but those entries are heavily annotated with links to sources.

If you are dealing with matters of opinion rather than fact, you should never rely on a single source, no matter what it is.

Answer 4

you're darn good that the more youthful are turning to the internet. We also like alJazeera. Why? because of the truth the u . s . does not favor us to hearken to something they ought to assert. stupid decision. we are able to continually be able to get understanding from any and all sources. i might want to grant that Fox5 information has a viewing target market of many times 29 - 35 years historic contained in the mornings, and the over 40 5 historic crew even as O'Reilly is broadcast. CNN and MSNBC run an in intensity second. i am going to credit status Fox 5 with a number of its broadcasting. on the least it covers a broader information base than the others. that is now not all Iraq and Iran. They discuss different information products also. yet then, i do not extremely care anymore. i finished observing them months contained in the previous. i'm least complicated speaking of the era of time in which I watched them often times. besides the undeniable fact that the more youthful... We extremely do not care a lot about television anymore. do not care about ratings and s--t both. We purely favor the information.

Answer 5

Wikipedia is okay for some research but keep in mind that anyone can change the information. If you find a fact that you want to use, come back and double check it in a couple hours. If someone messed up the information, it is usually fixed two to three hours afterwards.

Answer 6

In general yes, but you need to treat ANYTHING you find online with some suspicion. Wikipedia is great for basic research. However if you are dealing with controversial topics or current events, the entries can be biased. There's no reason not to go there, but be sure to double-check the facts.

Answer 7

I think it's a good starting place, but you need to verify each fact you find there with another, more trusted source. The nice thing about wiki is that they often have footnotes, so you can go straight to the source and find the nugget of information that you are looking for. (Or see if the wiki author is BS'ing you and just putting random footnotes in.)

Answer 8

Yes,Wikipedia can be trusted by the students .it is updated from time to time and contains the latest informations and developments.

Answer 9

As a student, I often turn to it as a source; however, it is important to keep in mind that it is not as credible as Britannica, or some other established encyclopedia, because people can, and do, change the facts.

So look at it with a weary eye, but it will often be correct...

Answer 10

I am a High School teacher and I have found it to be accurate and have integrity - much like the printed Encyclopedia Brittanica was.
It is very thorough as well.