2006-11-20 10:55:48 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No! Dan Quayle is an idiot and is twice as smart as Bush.
2006-11-20 12:47:24 · answer #1 · answered by iknowtruthismine 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
and why don't George W Bush and Dan Quayle ever appear in a room at the same time?
2006-11-20 10:59:14 · answer #2 · answered by Nick F 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Palinism is asldiufgws bfoiwhflamnf askhf ;osdjfsdi wsmflknd vclxclvmzx .vojfmd;m d'vikmds'vk'm v..... Sorry, I have been given caught up with the holy ghost merely now and began posting in tongues... This: "they imprinted their ideological prescriptions on an intellectually bankrupt conservative flow, which had long because of the fact misplaced touch with its classic moorings." is brilliantly concise and insightful... I agree a hundred%.
2016-12-17 13:26:14 · answer #3 · answered by salguero 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, Dan Quayle is much smarter.
2006-11-20 11:13:35 · answer #4 · answered by Nort 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Not hardly. Quayle was an idiot, but he was still more intelligent than Bush. But then, a fungus is more intelligent than Bush.
2006-11-20 11:09:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Quayle is much more articulate. Really.
2006-11-20 10:59:06 · answer #6 · answered by ? 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Nah - Quayle was a LOT smarter. At least he could say "nuclear."
2006-11-20 10:59:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
What a damn-fool question. Typical empty-minded liberal gushing.
2 pts.
2006-11-21 16:38:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No. Quayle was stupid, but nowhere near THIS stupid.
2006-11-20 12:25:37 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
No, but you wouldn't recognize that because you do not know the English language and how to ask a question using more than one subject.
2006-11-20 10:59:20 · answer #10 · answered by Answergirl 5 · 2⤊ 4⤋