English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

7 answers

http://www.multied.com/revolt/stamptax.html

The question was never the immediate amount of taxation that the British were asking of the colonists. The question was whether the British had the right to do it at all. We're talking about people [the American colonists] with enormous sensitivity to the dangers of power. If you conceded the right to Parliament to tax and if there was no check on it, no limit, it could go on indefinitely. You could be bled white. The power to tax was the power to destroy."

—Pauline Maier, Scholar

Contrary to popular impression, taxes in America existed throughout the colonial period prior to the American Revolution. Colonial governments relied on a variety of taxes to support themselves including poll, property and excise taxes. The great Boston patriot, Samuel Adams, was himself a tax collector, though not a very good one. His accounts were [sterling]8,000 in arrears at the time The Stamp Act was implemented.

What outraged colonists was not so much the tax as the fact that it was being imposeed from England. Reaction to the Stamp Act in the colonies was swift and, on occasion, riotous.

In Virginia, Patrick Henry made a reputation for himself in a bold speech before the House of Burgesses. "Caesar had his Brutus, Charles I his Cromwell," he said. "May George III profit from their example."

In Massachusetts, rioters ransacked the home of the newly appointed stamp commissioner, Andrew Oliver. He resigned the position the next day.



Tar & feathering cartoon





Threatening or attacking the Crown-appointed office-holders became a popular tactic against the act throughout the colonies. Though no stamp commissioner was actually tarred and feathered, this Medieval brutality was a popular form of 18th century mob violence in Great Britain, particularly against tax collectors.

Tarring and feathering dated back to the days of the Crusades and King Richard the Lionhearted. It began to appear in New England seaports in the 1760s and was most often used by patriot mobs against loyalists. Tar was readily available in shipyards and feathers came from any handy pillow. Though the cruelty invariably stopped short of murder, the tar needed to be burning hot for application.

By November 1, 1765, the day the Stamp Act was to officially go into effect, there was not a single stamp commissioner left in the colonies to collect the tax.

http://www.pbs.org/ktca/liberty/popup_stampact.html

http://www.pbs.org/ktca/liberty/chronicle_timeline.html

2006-11-20 11:01:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The Stamp act is related to the revolutionary war as in both cases the Britsh are involved

2006-11-20 10:56:43 · answer #2 · answered by Ashwin M 3 · 0 0

Don't know what the Stamp Act was do you? Every offical document had to have the stamp of the King for a fee. Stationary had to also bear a stamp for which the stationer paid. Now you can aswer the question yourself.

2006-11-20 10:59:28 · answer #3 · answered by Sophist 7 · 0 0

There are various motives that I definitely have seen in historic previous books I definitely have examine presently. a million. The F&I conflict mobilized the close by militias, equipped them greater valuable, and gave them container adventure. That business enterprise and self belief exchange into necessary for the Radicals, to type a revolution in any respect. 2. The Colonial troops have been taken care of as 2nd-classification squaddies by utilising the British "Regulars." This resentment and frustration alienated many in a position squaddies, which incorporates George Washington. 3. Alliances of the diverse Indian tribes made a extensive distinction. The Colonial military's first significant marketing campaign exchange into into upstate ny and Pennsylvania, to punish the 5 tribes of the Iriquois united states of america that had allied with the British. 4. Colonial militia instruments have been granted land in upstate long island after the F&I conflict. an entire unit (company, regiment) could colonize a township. That exchange into effectual simply by fact the colonists already knew and depended on one yet another, ought to combat off the Indians, and had an organizational shape. those colonies in the fertile Mohawk Valley (favourite simply by fact the militia Townships) promptly became a farming breadbasket, and between the prizes of the inventive conflict. regrettably, approximately 0.5 of those farmers and their families remained unswerving and the different 0.5 joined the Revolution, coming up a bloody, own civil conflict in long island. 5. Dominance of the British over the French - with the Brits now entrenched in greater Canada (Ontario), there exchange right into a British base of operations outdoors the hot England Federation, and a trip spot for Loyalist refugees. 6. The economic burden incurred by utilising the F&I conflict triggered taxes to fund a militia in North us of a of america, and those taxes have been area of what the radicals got here across "insupportable."

2016-10-22 10:58:52 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

well the stamp act made the colonies even more mad at Great Britain which eventually led us to declare our independence from them. England wasn't happy that we wanted to be independent, so we got into a war

2006-11-20 10:56:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

the stamp act was a tax from great britain on us. we did not like to be taxed w/o representation so we declared our independence on them starting the revelutionary war.

2006-11-20 11:02:59 · answer #6 · answered by camm300 4 · 0 0

it was one of the many controversies/small "argument" that led up to the BIG THING....during that time before the revo war it was all about freedom and not having british control taxes

2006-11-20 10:56:38 · answer #7 · answered by justaquestion 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers