write something about Refuting evlution and Supporting creation!!
write it in ur own word..
so i can get more information ...thx u
2006-11-20 09:58:49 · 11 answers · asked by Question box 1 in Social Science ➔ Anthropology
Refuting evolution is akin to lying.
Supporting creation is a matter of stewardship.
Supporting Creationism is a matter of faith.
Supporting "Scientific" Creationism is a matter of politics and is all about lying.
2006-11-20 10:33:55 · answer #1 · answered by novangelis 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Sorry, there is no evidence supporting creation, only faith. The biggest argument for creation is the "gaps" in fossil records and the complexity of some organic systems, namely the eye and the flagella in some bacteria. The argument is that they were too complex to have evolved via natural selection, but must have been "designed" as a finished product by a creator. For more on this subject, look up "Intelligent Design" on the Net or in the religion section of your library.
Evolution, on the other hand, would take several libraries worth of text to give the current evidence. Either way, you can't refute evolution with logic, in fact, you must ignore it.
2006-11-20 18:11:20 · answer #2 · answered by Labsci 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Science and faith are two branches of the human experience that are linked by our very existence. A true scientist is always trying to prove a hypothesis. But first you have to believe in your hypothesis to prove it. So faith happens before science. Science will prove or disapprove your belief depending on you methods and objectives which will take you back to faith. The history of any scientific disipline will show you how uncertain scientist are before the actually discover something, even after a discovery ther is always more questions. Don’t be a victim of evangelical rhetoric. The bible wasn’t and cannot be expected to a scienctifical book is meant to present the revelation of God . That revelation has scientifical implications that we haven’t even started to look for. God wanted men to be like him. Was that a consecuence of us being created as intelligent beings? Was man ready to be like God without God? Religious Faith does not contradict the true scientifical discoveries. Science as we know it in our century is relatively a new discipline and the jargon it uses is a new as 250 years old. The boom in science and physics and the privilege we have to have access that information in our century is something that was not available 500 years ago nevertheless 2000 years ago. Plus the majority of the people were not alphabetized, that was a priviledge of the rich. If you try to use the bible to understand the material world you are using the wrong book.
How God can talk to people in ways they can understand him. Even with all of our advantages our intelligence is really small compared to God’s intelligence. The bible is trying to reveal the character of GOD, who he is, how he acts and what he wants. All the other curiosities are left to US humans to discover and to conquer. That is our dignity and mission. How do you expected God to tell you the essence of all material things scientifically then knowing he gave you the inteliigence to discover them. You want it the easy way. A Revelation that tells you everything so you dont have to go thru the work of discovery? that spells lazziness to me. The Bible and genesis shows THE order in which things were made and that order is exactly the same order in which Science explains it. The Bible is not a literal book is a metaphysical, symbolic, enigmatic it provokes questions.
Scientifical discoveries about the evolution of life are akin with the bible. In respect to ourselves as human species we will still have to keep searching to understand how our biological evolution happened. That has not been fully explained by anthropological science. Maybe the point is not to use the bible literally try to understand the sociology of the time, Who were the scriptures made for and how they explained things in simple terms. For God: “ one day is one second and A million Years is one day”. Read TEILHARD de Chardin and the Divine Mileu. Is a great cosmogenic concept of creation.
2006-11-21 03:27:09 · answer #3 · answered by ION-CONSTITUTION 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Creation is euphoria, Evolution is factual. How come we can find skeletal remains, stone tools, fauna, early paintings, graves, and even wood tools that range from thousands to millions of years old, but we can't find a damn wooden ark that is less than 6,000 years old?
"Religion is the opiate of the masses"
Karl Marx
2006-11-21 20:17:05 · answer #4 · answered by chris j 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Evolution contradicts itself in many ways, and besides Creation makes more sense.
2006-11-21 15:05:32 · answer #5 · answered by nymphette13 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Life is complex and for evolution to support this complexity is impossible. Well that reminds me.....Darwin knew the truth, though he realized it at the fag end of his life. People! If by any chance you happen to know or get in touch with his (Darwin's) relatives, ask for the truth, as it is said that the truth has been tucked away in one of the manuscripts, which is well preserved even to this day.....good luck!
2006-11-21 03:11:00 · answer #6 · answered by Charmer 2 · 0⤊ 4⤋
To be honest, I don't think there is anything you can say in support of creation. Unless of course you're willing to tell blatant lies and distort the truth.
2006-11-20 18:01:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
look at the world. look what GOD has created. sure, humans adjust to the environment, (ie diffenret skin colors, afraican americans for example, chinese eyes...) but look at the human anatomy. if one thing goes wrong, it will falter. there is no way we could have evolved from a single cell becuase if we did, it wud take biollions and trillions of years just to make half the perfect human body that we have.
2006-11-20 18:03:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
There is no evidence for creation.
There is enough evidence for evolution to be considered a theory.
2006-11-20 18:06:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
Faith is about it. There is no science or evidence (fossils). those point to evolution.
2006-11-20 18:03:03 · answer #10 · answered by Take it from Toby 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋