If you were told the only way to continue the war in Iraq and on terror was through repealing Bush's tax cuts

Question

Would you support that or would the war be deemed unnecesarry then? Obviously repealing the tax cuts for money to pay for the wary.

Ah pay for the war, sorry about that.Not Wary.

Answer 1

Yes, I would support it,

Unless the money was used for welfare....

Then i wouldn't

Answer 2

I would repeal the Bush tax cuts. The war on terror is more important.

Answer 3

each and every conflict is fought for some aims set till now hand. The conflict in Iraq became into additionally began with 2 aims and those have been (a million) removing of weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs) and (2) removing of Saddam government with the aid of fact of its help for terrorists. the 1st purpose might desire to no longer be performed with the aid of fact there have been NO WMDs what so ever and 2nd purpose became into no longer sufficiently super to incredibly salary a conflict. US might desire to do away with Saddam with different capacity like a coup, inner flow by Iraqis and so on (as US has executed it in different international places contained in the previous), so that's secure to assert that the easily purpose became into to have actual administration over the oil wells and that has been performed. conflict against Terror is a commercial slogan thats why neither UN nor majority of the countries participated/ supported the conflict. the only international places that actively participated have been people who had direct project with the oil. The harmless civilians and US infantrymen being killed in Iraq is infact an act of terrorism and could stop. In each and every of the fairness each and every of the foreign places forces might desire to be despatched returned from iraq and Iraqis might desire to be enable loose to return to a variety upon formation of their government and how they like to stay. No united states has any precise to intrude in yet another united states's inner affairs as each and every of the countries contained in the worldwide are equivalent and have the main appropriate to stay freely and independently.

Answer 4

If you knew what terrorism in your own town was you would support a war to eliminate the hitting of soft tartgets. In South Africa the terrorists are now government. We now dont have bombs going off in towns, but have to live behind security fences and gates. There is fear when we go out because you get highjacked with an AK47. Daily there are cash in transit heists. The governement and police are corrupt. Look at South Africa's "crime" problems and you will see what happens when terrorism runs unchecked. All these terrorists came home armed.

Answer 5

The war was a new and unbudgeted expense. The tax cuts should have been repealed AND domestic programs should also have been cut to pay for the war. If the war was really necessary for our safety, either the American people would have understood and accepted the sacrifice or been revealed to be greedy and selfish. By repealing tax cuts and cutting programs, EVERYONE gets to contribute to the sacrifice.

Answer 6

The war has always been unnecessary...as for tax cuts or increases... we all must remember that taxes are what keep this country going.. we do not live here for nothing!

Answer 7

No repealing tax cuts. The government is pulling in more money that it would be without the tax cust.

Answer 8

Once you make the rich start paying for their war they won't want anything to do with it. Their already sneaking away because of all the corruption coming out about Haliburtion and KBR.

Answer 9

The war is more important than any money.

Answer 10

We would never be told that because it would be too childish for anyone to believe.
If we gave up the tax cuts, it would hurt the economy so much that both we AND the government would have LESS MONEY.
Democrats might go for it because many of them don't work and pay taxes anyway.