(or should that be the other way around? I don't know, what do you think?)
2006-11-20 09:06:03 · 19 answers · asked by A True Gentleman 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
what I don't understand is your failure to recognise that Blair never answers the questions put to him, he will answer e.g. Mr. Prime Minister what do you intend to do about the appalling situation regarding funding for NHS?
..Answer I do know that when the opposition were in power they never spent as much as we do now on helping the poor.. or something equally irrelevant!
2006-11-20 16:07:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Churchill was a man of his time,he succeeded in getting the country together in conflict for a number of years Churchill remained prime minister,the prime minister role today is very much different from 60 years ago tony Blaire is the leader of the labour party and to be the leader for the amount of time that he has is good,when tony Blaire leaves the country will then select a new government if the leader is labour or not time will tell
2006-11-20 17:24:02 · answer #2 · answered by angie n 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Blair talks a lot but with Churchill actions speak louder than words
2006-11-20 18:35:14 · answer #3 · answered by barn owl 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
churchill was sharper than that lucifarian worshiper blair any day .its a pity we havent got a churchill nowa days ,we wouldnt be slipping into a world wide version of nazi germany .but the fact is the secrets societys ,the people that own the world banks run so called civilised countrys governments. people of churchills stature would never get close to number 10 now .these sick demonic freaks are so rich they have so much power they see things different to normal people ,they see us as cattle ,canon fodder and we are in for dark days in the near future if people dont wake up .do a little reasearch ,stand up for your rights and freedoms and question our government.police state on its way .
2006-11-20 18:16:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Are you kidding?
Churchill was a REAL LEADER! Seriously when he and Aneurin Bevan were around (albeit on opposing sides) this country had truly "never had it so good"!!
Sadly men like Churchill and Bevan are a lost breed. That Spineless ar.se-licker of the rich, Blair, is a seriously unfunny joke as is his shower of tosspots (such as Two fricking Jags) who soak up our taxes in the House of Commons. They literally couldn't "lead" a pissup in a brewery let alone a country.
When can we have a REAL leader to bring a bit of self respect and a decent standard of life to the hard working taxpayer who lives here?!
2006-11-20 18:25:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Churchill had enormous experience in "Victorian" foreign policy and imperialism and was himself a soldier going back to the times of Lawrence who was his friend.
Churchill had wisdom that grew with age and was extremely close to Eisenhower during WW2 on the tactics employed on the Normandy landings - he was hands on.
Churchill had a great intellect and humour, but it was a different time. (He was half American)
Blair cannot be compared with Churchill, it is in fact an insult to Churchill.
2006-11-21 05:21:02 · answer #6 · answered by ian d 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
There are a lot of anti-Blair opinions just because of Iraq.
Otherwise he is on par with Churchill for those that have read history and not just newspaper reports.
2006-11-22 06:34:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's a pity more people don't read the question and answer it. When your in your prime by implication it means your fairly young with all your faculties unimpaired!. Churchill would have wiped the floor with him by both wit and intellect.
2006-11-20 19:55:02 · answer #8 · answered by Rob Roy 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i think tony Blair is suffering the same as Churchill did when he tried to warn the world of Hitler,but liberals like chamberlain managed to denounce him,and in the end he was right,but this time England has the enemy on their shores already,history always repeats itself,but if we refuse to learn the lessons,what then,liberals in England and the U.S. will gut the armies,and we will be defense less,there will be no help from across the pond this time,we the people of two great nations will be on are own this time,the world will fear the muslims to try and help!
2006-11-20 18:08:45 · answer #9 · answered by truckman 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
My understanding is that Churchill still stands as the greatest leader in modern British history...
Just my .01
-dh
2006-11-20 17:15:07 · answer #10 · answered by delicateharmony 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋