2006-11-20 09:02:42 · 23 answers · asked by Gymmy D S 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
23.8 based on the premise that the fusculating dilem has a rudimentary hinemon attached.
2006-11-20 09:20:56 · answer #1 · answered by thvannus@verizon.net 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
X=5
2006-11-20 17:04:57 · answer #2 · answered by mane 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
X=6
2006-11-20 17:10:18 · answer #3 · answered by hunterentertainment 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Y-1?
2006-11-20 20:48:16 · answer #4 · answered by Its not me Its u 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
5
2006-11-20 17:20:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
x=10
2006-11-20 17:10:21 · answer #6 · answered by Kaypee 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Holy Gymmy, You've obviously never been married, the X takes everything Dude!!!!!! there for the value of X is all the other things combined! You better get a lawyer to draw You up a pre nuptial my good Lad,LOL; Listen here to Your Old Uncle Dram on this one, I've been married and divorced a few times now!!!!!
2006-11-20 19:11:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
not sure about that. when i use letters in math its when im doing hexadecimal where 0-9 = 0-9, A=10, B=11, and on until F=15.
2006-11-20 20:07:59 · answer #8 · answered by Stand-up Philosopher 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
42
2006-11-20 17:05:13 · answer #9 · answered by St.Anger 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because the equation that defines the values is undefined, then so is X. So at most, one can only say with certainty given the above information that X=X.
2006-11-20 18:30:46 · answer #10 · answered by R[̲̅ə̲̅٨̲̅٥̲̅٦̲̅]ution 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Zero
2006-11-20 17:08:31 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋