English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I guess we will just have to let the forensic evidence explain it.

2006-11-20 08:41:49 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Celebrities

12 answers

Try rewatching the miles of film in trial footage and commentary. I doubt what he had to say differed all that much.

2006-11-20 08:43:22 · answer #1 · answered by DonSoze 5 · 0 0

As a man found innocent by a jury, OJ has rights under Freedom of Speech Law and has done nothing to require censorship. He was thoroughly investigated, tried in court and had the evidence evaluated by a jury who found him "not guilty" of this crime. He has always maintained his innocence of this deed and he wrote a theoretical book (which does not contain a confession). Money was probably the motivation in writing the book as there is a civil suit debt and a need to provide an inheritance for his children etc. The trial attorney's Cochran, Marcia and Darden wrote their own books and received millions.
A few things that the jury may have considered:
-The investigator who found the glove later committed PERJURY regarding his extreme racist comments.
- Another investigator took a vial sample of OJ's blood from the lab and carried it INTO the crime scene.
- The glove DID NOT fit OJ's hand.
- There never was the amount of blood on OJ's body, clothes, house or car CONSISTENT with someone who had committed that crime in person..
- The murder weapon was NEVER connected to him or found.
- The jury was taken to visit OJ's house and DID NOT see a large blood trail.
- There were no witnesses to the actual crime.
- Likely the jury found him innocent because there was a LACK of real evidence to convict.
Some may disagree with the verdict but it's unfair for them to blatantly say with a certainty that this man is guilty.
At times a publisher controls the general content and even the title of a book which an author must agree to if he needs the contract.

2006-11-25 12:05:49 · answer #2 · answered by sunshine25 7 · 0 1

OJ is so money hungry now he's going to figure out someway of getting anything about him out there. I fear we will see him headlining in Vegas or somewhere trying to do stand up or trying to become an inspirational speaker for harden criminals. The man has no morals. I wouldn't even be surprised if he turned up on some television Evangelist show saying that he found the Lord and has repented, just so his 15 minutes of fame never end. What a sick bastard!!! His mother most be spinning in her grave.

2006-11-20 09:00:57 · answer #3 · answered by WillLynn 1 6 · 0 0

Well, forensic evidence didn't help in terms of his trial. The best that we have to go on is that he lost his civil suit...the court believed that he was "responsible" for the murders. Unless we get some sort of death bed confession from OJ, we may never know for sure.

2006-11-20 08:43:43 · answer #4 · answered by Bob J 2 · 0 0

The responses to this difficulty is thrilling and different. There are sturdy, stereotypical and different replies and comments approximately this difficulty; and concerning no count number if the e book could have been revealed. easily it is no longer proper to debate or placed up how a individual might have killed all of us. that's an emotional subject and emotions do in comparison to information. Factually presented, i'm uncertain if the information have been introduced so coherently. besides the undeniable fact that, i've got self belief that someway Simpson performed a place interior the crimes. White usa has a puzzling time with the outcomes; and so does a large majority of black usa. White usa is locate to getting "justice" even while the information at the instant are not clean some black on white crime. Black usa does in comparison to what has transpired; and perpetually they bear in mind lynchings, murders and different hardcore crimes commited against them that have been unpunished or marginally. We could save in mine a fact approximately human beings...we view the international and function comments that are consistent with our reports. it is puzzling thinking that any guy can committ against the regulation and walk unfastened or receive a marginal punishment. besides the undeniable fact that, it has occurred repeated in the time of history.

2016-12-10 12:39:24 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I'm glad to know that the people can still have an impact on what appears on TV. They would never have canceled it if they didn't feel that people were not going to watch.

2006-11-20 08:47:37 · answer #6 · answered by constant dieter 3 · 0 0

His book got cancelled

2006-11-20 09:04:42 · answer #7 · answered by Muffin 5 · 0 0

Are they really? If that's true, that's the first good thing I've heard all day.

Thank heavens, I was so appalled that he would write such a disrespectful and blatantly smug book. I feel for his kids.

2006-11-20 08:43:53 · answer #8 · answered by Lanani 6 · 0 0

If I would have answered your question first I would have sat and thought about a clever response, then I would have hit the "Answer Question" button and...

2006-11-21 06:36:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

OJ just needs to go sit down somewhere!!!!!!!!!

2006-11-20 08:43:38 · answer #10 · answered by gww1911 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers