English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Hello to everybody from Rome

2006-11-20 08:25:02 · 22 answers · asked by girellina66 GVG ® 6 in Politics & Government Elections

22 answers

time to move to Canada

2006-11-20 08:29:28 · answer #1 · answered by Tiko 3 · 4 2

Rice cannot hold a candle to Clinton. No way, no how. She's known only as a Bush "yes man" and nothing more. Clinton has done things to establish herself as a person of importance and interest. (And yes, I too believe Rice is a closet Lesbian. Not that there's anything wrong with that, of course theirs not). But her "christian right" would never go for it.

But this is not even a point of interest, because Rice will not be on the Republican Ticket. The "Good Old White Boy Party" letting a Black Woman run is just laughable, extrememly laughable. No, they will have a white man running for President as usual and maybe a token Black as Vice-President (but I doubt since the are but a single shot from Presidency).

The Democrats will not run with Hillary Clinton (since I truly believe she won't run). I think she just likes to keep her finger in the pot to scare the Republicans, like the old women that they are. But if they do, I'll vote for her, and encourage as many illegals to vote for her as I can (lol, joke). However, I must be honest and say, I do think Hillary Clinton is an amazing woman and would vote for her in a minute.

2006-11-20 08:48:00 · answer #2 · answered by AdamKadmon 7 · 0 2

i'd would desire to vote for HIllary Clinton. Why? because of the fact in spite of the undeniable fact that Condi is an exceptionally psychological and clever lady, she lacks the journey mandatory to run an entire us of a. suitable now she is a puppet in the G.B. puppet teach doing and asserting what he needs. that's no longer management. Hillary has taken on the region as senator right here in NYS, and has executed some good issues all on her very own for sparkling Yorkers. She has the management journey and abilities mandatory to run this us of a. Having her husband as a former president rather enables her so some distance as remote places coverage and kin themes. So what if her hubby had slightly relaxing below his table, what proportion presidents do you think of had trysts with different women human beings? maximum of them!!! they only did no longer %. a blabbermouth which could no longer shop her mouth close. That episode shows Hillary's resilience, and which you will knock her down ,yet she gets back UP struggling with,AND WIN!

2016-12-28 06:58:27 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Condoleeza Rice was the worst National Security Advisor ever!!!
She held the PDB of Aug 6th that said
Osama binladen determined to attack in the U S and told Bush "no big Deal"
Then it was her job to determine wether Iraq had WMD's
and she was wrong on that
No doubt the 2 biggest gaffs ever by an NSA or any advisor to a Prez


OK Do we all know what the National Security Advisor does?
And that PDB = presidential daily briefing
The Job of National Security advisor is to disseminate Intelligence that comes through all the agencies CIA, FBI, Secret Service, ATF
and the NSA determines what is a Clear and Present danger to the US
So wether Iraq had WMD's is definitley in the scope of that job. She was told about the decision to go forward with the war in Iraq before Collin Pwell was according to the 9/11 report and Carl Woodwards reports. so she was more listened to then the Secrarary of State
And worst of all she did have that PDB and dismissed it even tho in 8 months time Rice never met with the Counter Terrorism principles even tho they were screaming for a meeting.

I am not laying all the blame on her but FAIR OR UNFAIR it was part of her job to determine wether either of these things was true ofr false. But after those mistakes she gets Promoted???!!!

2006-11-20 08:53:39 · answer #4 · answered by gdeach 3 · 0 1

Condi has more street cred and a lot of people (both dem and rep) seem to dislike Hillary for numerous reasons. Condi has a better chance at winning than Hillary.

It was never Condi's job to find out if someone had WMDs, so the previous poster is full of baloney! Hillary is not generally respected, so that poster is full of it too. If she was generally respected, everyone on this thread would say they like her. I do not like the woman because I find her inane, annoying, and without courage. She would be a terrible president, much like her husband was terrible ... except even WORSE. I would never vote for her for anything but a swirly.

2006-11-20 08:58:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Maybe that would happen in some kind of KoolAid reality, but those two will never make it to that level of contention. Condi has lost credibility because of this administration's misadventure in Iraq, and Hillary will never be more than the junior senator from New York. Good try though...

2006-11-20 08:33:53 · answer #6 · answered by cheyennetomahawk 5 · 1 1

Rice has way too much baggage. Hillary is a generally respected and intelligent woman. Hillary would have my vote for sure.

2006-11-20 08:46:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

It will never happen because Rice needs to first be completely honest and come out as a Lesbian.

The closet is a terrible place to be for a politician.

2006-11-20 08:33:35 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

it just shows the sad state of the union
that that could be taken as anything but a joke

2006-11-20 08:34:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Juicy but Condi has more street cred than hillary who EVERYONE somewhat hates

2006-11-20 08:27:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

I detest them both; and detest really isn't a strong enough word to describe my feelings on these two 'persons.' It's too bad Elizabeth Dole won't run. SHE would have done a remarkable job. Unfortunately, her time is past.

2006-11-20 08:33:08 · answer #11 · answered by Lonnie P 7 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers