English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

In too many elections (like the one just passed) I find myself looking at ballots where I don't want ANY of the candidates elected. But there's no way to vote, "None of the Above" (NOTA)

Would you favor a Constitutional Amendment that all elections include a choice of NOTA, and that if NOTA won an election, a NEW elections would be held in which none of the candidates in the prior election could run?

2006-11-20 07:24:56 · 2 answers · asked by A_Patriot 2 in Politics & Government Government

2 answers

We would end up tying up the political process for years on ONE election alone. It would be better to level the playing field and put caps on money spent on an election. If that is done then there would be an increase of people able to run therefore more quality in candidates. Big corporations would no longer have control of politics.

2006-11-20 07:30:52 · answer #1 · answered by jerofjungle 5 · 0 0

Absolutely.

2006-11-20 15:27:39 · answer #2 · answered by open4one 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers