English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

This answer should be easy to write down!

2006-11-20 07:23:39 · 5 answers · asked by Anthony A 1 in Arts & Humanities History

5 answers

The sad thing is the reason for 9/11 is the US. If you grow up listening to the right wing and MTV you believe we Americans can do whatever we want or in the latter we can tell you the hit song or fad of the week. Ever since England suppressed the Middle East support for Germany during World War II the Middle East has wanted their freedom. Even today, many of the countries have government set-up and supported by the West. Even prior to World War Two, Western oil barons were extracting great wealth from their oil-rich colonial holdings. They were already well aware that the potential volumes of Middle Eastern oil reserves were conservatively enormous.
However, the likelihood of the West remaining as friendly allies was being threatened by Egyptian Nationalists calling for an end to colonial occupation. A mild sense of panic was beginning to overtake the Western elite because there was growing support for the Nationalization of oil interests throughout the Middle East. This move of course would have put an end to the West's exploitation of Arab oil. The elite knew only too well that oil was inevitably going to bring not only great wealth, but immense power to the Middle Eastern countries. In fact, if Middle East supplies outlasted those in the West, the Arabs could have potentially amassed enough wealth and strategic power to rival or ultimately threaten the supremacy of the West!!



To keep wars from appearing like contests for wealth and power, the elite go to elaborate lengths to disguise the real motives,usually by camouflaging the war in a flag-draped cloak of patriotism. After all, the elite's economic well-being hinges on their ability to successfully conscript and enlist the working class to die in their service, just as serfs were forced to do in Feudal times.
When they finally hit back it is their fault? I don't think so and no I am not agreeing with them. I think they could have gotten better result by either hitting the Statue of Liberty or better threatening to do it. In fact, I think if they had just threatened it many Americans would have seen the issue and been on their side. Remember what your grandmother used to say, "you get more with a teaspoon of sugar then a gallon of vinegar"?

God Bless You and the Southern People (another suppressed people)

2006-11-20 11:48:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Because we needed a date between September 10th and September 12th.

2006-11-20 15:36:34 · answer #2 · answered by Ruthinia 6 · 0 1

Evil small minds who wanted to send a message.

They wanted a big target, a spectacle. So they killed civilians at their place of work. People armed with briefcases and phones who had done nothing to them.

2006-11-20 15:30:13 · answer #3 · answered by slipstreamer 7 · 3 0

World domination.

2006-11-20 15:37:46 · answer #4 · answered by Sophist 7 · 0 0

ANGRY MINDS SEEK REVENGE...

2006-11-20 15:33:11 · answer #5 · answered by cork 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers