that men lose sensitivity due to circumcision. I read somewhere that men who are circumcised get more oral sex too make up for the loss of sensitivity. Now i am no anti-circumcision person, i am glad i am circumcised. more oral sex too me is a plus. but ladies, wouldnt that be worse for you??? lol
2006-11-20 07:10:25 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships ➔ Marriage & Divorce
There is no thinking about it. It is a medical fact that circumcision reduces sensitivity. I am 32 and it was the thing to do when my parents had me. The medical field said that not doing it could cause cleanliness issues. Now they have changed their mind and say it does not. Very few people do it for religious reasons. I think it is barbaric. To cut part of baby boys penis off when he is born. If they were doing it in Africa not the US we would be outraged
As for the oral sex part--- I think it is the girls you date / married not what your penis looks like that determines that.
2006-11-20 07:18:59 · answer #1 · answered by Brian 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
don't believe any of the anti snip b/s.
no truth to it.
i was circumcised 2 years ago, have not lost sensitivity. sex feels better, even getting oral feels better.
most blokes don't care too much about showering and making sure every little bit is cleaned constantly.
i really doubt the 'more oral' is due to less sensitivity. more so cleanliness and appeal of it all out there where you can see it.
i mean compare it to, would you want to go down on a girl thats all dirty and grotty down there?
2006-11-24 12:46:41 · answer #2 · answered by Matt 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
All of the men I have known with 1 exception were circumcised. None of them have ever confided in me about lack of sensitivity. I had my son circumcised for 3 reasons: easier to clean; so he'd be like almost every other male around here; and my father had to have a circumcision when he was around fifty and he said it was very painful.
2006-11-20 15:45:20 · answer #3 · answered by Beth T 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think health issues warrant the decision to be circumcised. My uncle had a condition arise that required him to have it done after the age of 40. He wished like all get out, it had been done before. He went through misery and PAIN.....It is a lot easier to keep clean, and women are into cleanliness, not all men are "clean". (yes I know not all women are either) but as far as the oral sex do you know any men who don't want more of it, come on.......don't stick your head in the sand, either one of them; if you ain't got it goin' on there is probably more issues than this one.
2006-11-20 20:36:04 · answer #4 · answered by Sage 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I for one do believe in having the boy circumcised at birth. The end of it is where most of the nerves are at, not in the foreskin, yes there are some but most are in the end.
Boys are cleaner if they have been done. Personally I will not date a man with the possibility of getting married to him that has not been done. I do not want the infections that come with it.
2006-11-20 16:52:11 · answer #5 · answered by SapphireB 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, indeed there is loss of sensitivity!
D.H. seems to have to work very hard to orgasm, and lots of times I can't take it as long as it takes him to finish, and he has to give up. Most times he won't even bother trying to finish himself by hand, he just rolls over. He says he can hardly feel anything when he is in me. I don't do oral or rear.
He also says he gets very sore from his clothing, he runs a lot, and exercises.
2006-11-20 20:53:16 · answer #6 · answered by Bakerylady 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no it is healthier for a person and for ladies it is more eciting in sex .look at porn movies how nice models are also circum.......so go ahead man and make love like man..just do it to her and she will love it
2006-11-20 15:33:36 · answer #7 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Dont believe everything you hear.
2006-11-20 15:15:41 · answer #8 · answered by nanny2 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Have you been reading fairy tales?
2006-11-20 15:29:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋