Who is the lesser of two Evils for President, Mc Cain or Guiliani?

Question

Sorry, I think both would take our country down the wrong path but I want to see what others are thinking.
Tell me why you feel the way you do, thanks.

Answer 1

The best choice would be John Edwards. Giulliani has a lot of baggage and McCain sold out a long time ago.

Answer 2

I'm a democrat also, but I believe Guiliani would be better. He's really good under pressure. I am a northern New Jersey girl who works in NYC, and 9/11 made Guiliani a hero. He'll win because of votes and popularity.

Answer 3

Guiliani

Answer 4

I don't see either of them as "evil", but Giuliani is far too liberal to suit many Republicans, especially those from anywhere else but New York, and that's a lot of places.

Someone on this site suggested McCain as President and Giuliani as Vice President. Despite their differences of opinion on some political issues, this might be a workable compromise that would appeal to a lot of people in both major parties.

Answer 5

Guiliani would be better for America as a whole. He is socially liberal and fiscally conservative, conservative like the Republicans used to be.

McCain has been rubbing elbows with religious extremists like Jerry Falwell. This country needs to abandon aspirations of the church to run our government. Run your church, not our lives.

Answer 6

McCain.

McCain is principled, and although recently he has not always made what I would consider the "right" decisions, he would make a good president. His stances on torture and campaign finance show that he is more interested in what he believes is best for the people than playing politics. Guiliani isn't horrible, but I think he is more likely to play partisan politics than McCain.

Answer 7

it extremely is unhappy that U.S. elections continually boil right down to a selection of the lesser of two evils. Having only 2 important political events ensures severe polarization and a call between 2 cartoonish recommendations to each venture. allowing "campaign contributions" ends up in politicins all being in thepocket of specific pursuits, so the country won't be able to be run interior the pastime of its scitizens, and each bill could incorporate hundreds of thousands or billions of extra earnings spending to soothe those pursuits. allowing political advertisnig ensures that only the extremely prosperous and extremely linked can play the sport. To be linked politicians could attraction to the specific pursuits (instruct a development of accepting their bribes and handing over effects). the two events are far too corrupt. So right here we are lower back with 2 prosperous people who don't have no clue what something individuals are dealing with. only this time the value of the U.S. dollar has punged 50% over the final 8 years as we fail to stability our budget and rack up national debt. the two the value of oil and international food fees have doubled interior the previous twelve months. Riots overturned the government of Haiti and have ocurred in a minimum of five international places, with 33 extra counties in the present day in probability. The Pentagon forecasts riots interior the U.S. as quickly as 2020 and could run a conflict interest next month to simulate their reaction. against us, as we protest their dropping our final dollar. This consequence is so probably and predictable that we also have a clean contract with Canada assuring their military invovlement, in U.S. cities, against U.S. voters. With international safety on the side through becoming fees and economic upheaval, and with the point of desperation expected to sharply upward thrust interior the U.S. as subsequently our dysfunctional habit to government overspending, we must be very careful related to the value of government and any proposed expansions (healthcare, immigration, carbon tax, and so on). because of the fact the applicants grant extra readability on their positions and as their positions are in comparison and contrasted, i'm going to be looking forward to seeing which one commits to dramatically reducing military spending at the same time as no longer only including a ton of recent spending everywhere else. i'm deeply worried that the two applicants might fail the try.

Answer 8

Ditto Senior Citizen. Last night I heard McCain and he had viable answers for every problem and seems to be well-informed. Overall I don't see anyone yet I like better. You will find evils in all of us but the concern to re-instate the US as positive entity is McCain's objective.

Answer 9

Neither are evil. Of the 2, I think Giuliani would be the better Pres.

Answer 10

i'm a democract and would love to see the democracts take the white house in 2008. but if we must have a republican, i believe mccain would be a better candidate than guiliani.