English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

3 answers

Sounds like you are trying to get us to do your homework for you.

Why don't you try reading your textbook?

2006-11-20 06:15:14 · answer #1 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 0 0

Ogden Vs Gibbons

2016-09-29 01:17:54 · answer #2 · answered by amarvesh 4 · 0 0

At issue was the scope of the commerce clause of Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution; this provides that Congress shall have the power to "regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes." Chief Justice John Marshall held that the New York monopoly was an unconstitutional interference with the power of Congress over interstate commerce. He condemned the view that the states and the federal government are equal sovereignties. Federal power is specifically enumerated, but within its sphere Congress is supreme. State legislation may be enacted in areas reserved to the federal government only if concurrent jurisdiction is feasible (as in the case of taxation). The decision was highly influential in its explication of the federal structure of the United States.

Essentially, the final controlling authority of all commerce is the Federal, as relates to any and all inter-state commerce.

I hope this helps.

2006-11-20 07:14:38 · answer #3 · answered by lundstroms2004 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers