2006-11-20 06:07:28 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It's just a friggin question, geeze. I never said that it should happen.
2006-11-20 06:19:04 · update #1
Yes without delay. The list of his crimes against the world and the US is more than long enough to be impeached and tried in the World Court. It probably won't happen as it has to be weighed against the instability it will cause here and abroad. The scandal would be incredibly disruptive. And, in this country, we would rather cover up and keep the public misinformed as we don't seem to have any respect for the intelligence of the public. Keep them in the dark has been the mantra, even long before JFK, RFK, Martin Luther King, etc.
2006-11-20 06:17:18 · answer #1 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Well I'm not a congressman so it wouldn't really matter. And remember impeachment is just bringing him to trial for what he's done, it's not kicking him out of office. I don't like the man, I don't trust him, but I have yet to see actual proof of him committing crimes. And you can't just kick someone out of office because they make bad choices. The majority of Americans voted for him in 2004. And they have to live with the fact that he's ruining our country until 2008. I didn't vote for him, so it's not my fault. People should be smarter about the way they vote, they shouldn't blindly vote for a candidate because he's a member of a certain party. And I think President Bush is a clear example of why.
2006-11-20 14:15:33 · answer #2 · answered by cubbies9911 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd vote NO. Why waste the time and taxpayers' money to impeach him? He'll be out of office before it's all over anyway.
Instead, I'd like to see him tried in an international tribunal for high crimes against humanity, and - if he's convicted - he should hang right alongside Saddam Hussein.
Only Republicans are stupid and arrogant enough to initiate impeachment proceedings, and then only if it's for some really serious offenses like lying to Congress about an extra-marital indiscretion with another consenting adult.
Bush only lied to Congress (and the American public) about weapons of mass destruction, and his reasons for illegally and unconstitutionally invading another sovereign nation that in no way threatened, provoked or attacked the U.S.A. Why should he be impeached for killing 665,000 Iraqis and 3,000 American soldiers? That's certainly not as serious as getting a b.j. by a White House intern!!! -RKO-
2006-11-20 14:14:45 · answer #3 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
all the people who think he should make me laugh. YOu are saying there is proof he has done an impeachable offense. Well lets see what an impeachment is. The house of representatives have been given information, or "proof" that the person in question has in fact done something that is against his powers which would then be used for an investigation by the senate. So you are telling me you KNOW he has done something yet none of your SUPER GENIOUS TRUTH BE TOLD DEM LEADERS CAN FIND SOME PROOF TO EVEN START AN INVESTIGATION? Im sure glad we have dems on this site that are smarter and know more than the people they put in charge to run this country
2006-11-20 14:21:01 · answer #4 · answered by CaptainObvious 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes, we should go through the impeachment process. The process itself doesn't automatically throw Bush out of office. It is an investigation. Lies about the war, torture, and secret wiretaps are enough valid reasons to start the process. If Bush has done nothing wrong, he will welcome the process. I would think that if he was innocent, he would welcome the process so that he can clear himself of any and all charges. On the other hand, I don't think he is innocent and I don't think anyone, including the Republicans think that his is innocent. That is why you see such angry responses from this. If he is guilty, how do they justify to themselves, to their children, and to historians the reason they voted for this guy twice.
2006-11-20 14:28:22 · answer #5 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I'm not a member of the House of Representatives Nor do I imagine any are on this forum.
You need to ask your congressmen this forum is all about tit for tat reporting of TOS abuse.
Go big Red Go
2006-11-20 14:17:57 · answer #6 · answered by 43 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I would have to vote no until you prove an impeachable offense
2006-11-20 14:13:12 · answer #7 · answered by TEXAS TREY 3 · 5⤊ 1⤋
You cannot impeach unless you can demonstrate a crime was committed.
2006-11-20 14:38:31 · answer #8 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Articles of Impeachment are not even remotely justified. Do you understand the process?
2006-11-20 14:10:27 · answer #9 · answered by jh 6 · 4⤊ 3⤋
No. He has committed no impeachablr offense.
2006-11-20 16:40:26 · answer #10 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋