English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

explain how scientist have proven that god is real

2006-11-20 05:08:03 · 25 answers · asked by ? 2 in Science & Mathematics Physics

25 answers

One possible explanation of an all seeing God is done through additional dimensions.

Imagine a 2 dimensional world of "ants" living on your desk. All they can do is go forward, backward, left, and right. They can only see in these directions as well. You live in a 3 dimensional space so you can see up and down as well. Here you are, able to watch them all, without them ever seeing you. Now imagine what they would see if you suddenly squashed one of them with your finger tip. Your finger tip would appear out of nowhere to them. You could cause "miracles" by influencing their world without them seeing where that influence came from. (Divine Intervention)

Since we live in a 3 dimensional world (4 if you count time), you can expand this theory to include someone or something that lives in a 4 or 5 dimensional world. This God could see all of our world and exist through all time since time would be just like up and down was in the ants world. This God could then also choose to answer our prayers and influence what happens in our world.

However, this is just a theory that explains how a God could exist. It does not actually prove that one does exist. Since the definition of the word faith is that you have to accept something that cannot be proved, all this theory does is prove that you cannot say that there is no chance of a God existing.

2006-11-20 05:39:31 · answer #1 · answered by Andy M 3 · 1 2

To sum up others
They
Haven't
Can't
Never will.
If we could prove God exists, there would be no need for faith.
No faith,
No salvation, at least according to all the rules of religion, and the essence of the Bible and other holy scriptures as well.
So, sorry, it hasn't, can't, won't happen.
The closest they can come is to talk about the BIG bang, and consider that God caused it. That, however, is a perversion of science, and thus would be thrown out as too speculative.
Alternatively, to merely consider it is within the realm of personal choice on the part of a given scientist.
Otherwise we would have to confine ourselves to throwing out evidence from the fossil record, go back to believing the world is flat, and that the earth has only been round for a few thousand years.
Now, that is really limiting God! Eternal God may have always been creating, for billions upon billions of years.
Religion has a way of boxing it in because the leaders and theologians of some sects have not the sense to read and understand their own bible.

2006-11-20 13:22:54 · answer #2 · answered by Charles-CeeJay_UK_ USA/CheekyLad 7 · 3 0

Science doesn't typically set out to prove something true, or real. Instead it attempts to disprove something through the use of repeatable experimentation, with the aim of narrowing the domain of possible truths into laws and theorems.

Science has neither proven or disproven the existance of God and, generally, wouldn't attempt to. But it could be used to assess potential theological conclusions based on fact.

Alas, the onus of providing these "conclusive facts" lay squarely at the feet of those attempting to prove the existance of God. And because there are no verifiable facts [pertaining to this topic] available [at this time], the scientific conclusion is that God MAY OR MAY NOT EXIST.

Unfortunately, this lack of proof/disproof in the scientific method is often considered "genuine proof of God's existance" by those with a wholly discrediting and myopic view of humanity. To suggest that God simply must exist because mankind has failed to provide answers to some of the most perlexing questions that science has to ask is, for want of a better word, naive.

We know more about our own reality today than we knew 100 years ago, and in 100 years time we will know more than we do today. Subscribing to the view that "we know all there is to know but STILL haven't disproven the existance of God, therefore God MUST exist" is bordering on the irrational, and little more than popular reverse-psychology. Can you tell me what the next mid-week winning lottery numbers will be? Of course not. But you could by late Wednesday night.

2006-11-20 13:33:42 · answer #3 · answered by Simon D 3 · 2 0

Science is about fact & logic. God is about the supernatual & therefore is not based on logic. The more educated & scientific a person is the more he will move away from & doubt God. This is because his logical mind cannot deal with the illogical. A person who does not believe in ghost will seldom see one & even if he do he will find some logical explanation to explain it.Science will never be able to prove God. It is only those who truly believe & reach out to God that will know him. Atheists also will die believing that there is no God because God is not going 2 prove himself to them.He is not a formula that needs to be proven. We are not doing him any favor by believing in him. He is doing us the favor.

2006-11-20 13:32:25 · answer #4 · answered by Ethslan 5 · 1 1

Science hasn't proven anything so far as God is concerned . However a great scientist once said "One day science will reach the pinnacle of the mountain of knowledge and religion will have been sitting there the whole time . " I believe that was Einstien who said it .

2006-11-20 13:21:01 · answer #5 · answered by Ray H 7 · 2 1

They havent, the annoying thing is why should atheists and scientist who dont belive have to try an prove something weve never seen doesnt exist.Religious types should be trying to prove gods existance to us.

2006-11-21 07:34:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Oh yes they can.
When the cleverest people on earth get so clever they fail to understand why they can't go further, then that is the time they prove to themselves there is a greater being, a greater power.
Now it is a simple case to say otherwise if you lot out there think you are right. Prove it.
If you think they are wrong, show them that you can take over where they have failed.
It is a simple case of put up or shut up.
Or perhaps like me you have no answer and accept it.
It is true.

2006-11-20 13:59:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Scientists haven't proved that God is real.
There haven't been any confirmed sightings in 1,970-odd years, and even those sightings were considered dodgy, even by the people of the time.

2006-11-20 13:54:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

WHEN I PRAY HE ALWAYS LEADS ME IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION!!!! I do not need some scientist to prove to me that he is real. When I look at my children I know he is REAL. I am also an EMT and know that by seeing the people that he gives me the strength to save. I have seen some that did not look like they were going to make it, but they did, god said that it was not their time to go. I know that he is real no matter what anyone says. I would say that this world would be better off if people would believe in him and stop worrying what some over educated scientist has to say.

2006-11-20 13:18:55 · answer #9 · answered by sporteditions 2 · 1 4

If we were to change the conception of a Higher Being from faith to a scientific theory - it would stand the scrutiny of science because there is not one single, verifiable fact that would dispute its validity. Nor are there any verifiable, scientific facts that would prove its validity.
That is why we call it, "faith."

All theories relating to the origin of life or the origin of the universe start with all of the building blocks already in place - none try to explain the origin of these.

2006-11-20 14:47:49 · answer #10 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers