Pujols, baby, look at the strikeout totals.
2006-11-20 05:18:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by pdigoe 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
No, Howard is a big guy and can is not much of a help on D, but Pujols is a HR hitter and can play D
2006-11-20 12:58:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
I'll take a healthy Albert Pujols over Ryan Howard any day.
2006-11-20 12:47:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Do You See What Happens Larry? 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
HOWARD WON THE MVP!!
Just like I said....
God I hate Pujols.
2006-11-20 15:00:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by J-Far 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Beginning of last year, my answer would be no, but I DID get Howard in the second round in BOTH of my leagues. I won one league and finished 2nd in the other and I have him to thank.
I'll also add that barring injuries, if I have the first pick in the draft next year, I take Alfonso Soriano. The guy can do it all.
2006-11-20 15:10:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by jpspencer1966 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
I'd pick Howard, Pujols benefitted from a better lineup, Howard did not have that luxury.
2006-11-20 13:20:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
I like pujols
2006-11-20 13:37:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Blackie66 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
pujols is probably the best in the league. he is consistent and plays well. i would wait a few more years before judging Howard, he still is young.
2006-11-20 12:58:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by nick 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
i'd rather have albert pujols over ryan howard simply because pujols is a consistently good hitter and howard only had a good hitting year this year let him do it more consistently
2006-11-20 12:50:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
I'd take Howard. His stats prove the point that he should be the MVP.
2006-11-20 16:26:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by Tommy D 5
·
0⤊
1⤋