i need plzzz scientific evidences that homosexuality is unnatural...!!!!?

Question

plzzz i have a debate on this point and i need scientific evidences

Answer 1

Wrote a few points in this group post I have. I essentially argue for both sides on theological, philisophical, and practical point of view. I don't think scientific point of view helps much. Scientists are still looking for the 'gay' gene, and there are still no definite proof of homosexuality, in humans, that is.


XR

Answer 2

what do you define as unnatural?
I don't think nature will give you any points to debate on. Homosexuality has been shown to occur under natural conditions in various species of animals (e.g. bonobos, japanese macaques, dolphins, penguins, flamingos, ostriches, galahs).
Apart from that, the ancient greek and roman culture (on which much of western culture is still based on) saw it as something completely normal.
While definitely pointless for reproduction any sexual interactions can strengthen social bonds and therefore increase survival likelyhood of the individuals concerned.
If you want to argue against homosexuality you have to confine yourself to ethical/moral values of cultural groups. Nature isn't going to help you.

Answer 3

I don't agree with it, but the only one I can think of is that if homosexuality was purely genetic, they wouldn't reproduce (in most cases) and therefore the genes for homosexuality would be lost.
however I think homosexuality is more likely to be a mix of nature and nurture, just like most other things in biology!

Answer 4

You are out of luck. The natural world contains several exmples of homosexuality, orcas & porpoises to name a couple....

You are REALLY in the wrong category here, trying to inject a fundamentalist agenda into a science forum.

Answer 5

well for one if it was natural how would we reproduce. Human kind would extict if homosexuality was naural.

Answer 6

it doesnt make a baby