I believe that each room you enter can make you feel different in so far as one room can look cold and dark and another can be warm and bright and therefore you can feel good being in one room and not in another..
2006-11-18 21:51:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
of course . it depends on the colors of the walls , on how clean that room is or how the furniture is arranged .
2006-11-18 21:46:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by stormy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i'm sorry to admit that I by no skill experienced any so-observed as vacancy, not even entered in nothingness certainly! before everything, i don't be attentive to 'nothingness', the term i be attentive to not something approximately. And related to 'vacancy', properly, I heard of it from a number of my favourite persons yet by no skill experienced for my area (myself). in case you, working example, think of that 'vacancy' is an 'empty-international-form' something, then i ought to admit that i exchange into in that for a quick time, say for some seconds basically. simply by fact, the 2nd I felt the so-observed as vacancy, I became attentive to my presence there & that so-observed as international became crammed with me certainly! specific, it exchange right into a international the place i exchange into all in all, taking pictures the entire area by utilising me! This thoughts by no skill delivered any form of vacancy to my thoughts or thinking. I enjoyed that vacant international on my own by utilising thinking, telling something to me, listening to me, guffawing at me, advising me, recalling something & so & so. It passed off quite that i exchange into usually disturbed by utilising others' presence at some events! Now i'm beginning as much as have confidence in vacancy after your question & seek on your advice, ought to i think of on it deeply? ought to I 'create' vacancy' around me? could it relatively is something confident & effective? Or ought to all of us think of it as pessimists' vogue, the place a pessimist likes to be in vacancy?
2016-10-22 08:37:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋