English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-11-18 21:10:54 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Geography

3 answers

your question is strange, to say the least, and therefore hard to answer. grouped? probably not but then you must first make a list of products made & group them according to the type of industry they're involved . second, you ask about being organized. this is most difficult to answer because each place or type of business is 'organized' different than the first & others. there are some standards but what you might be looking for is not something answered so easily w/in this format. school project? consult your nearest major industry, ask to speak to someone in production or development & i'm sure they'd be glad to help (providing they understand the focus of your question). frankly, i don't.

2006-11-25 11:09:00 · answer #1 · answered by blackjack432001 6 · 0 1

Boy, you sure know how to draw em' out Amy. I don't know. I don't know what the answer is. The guys who post here may look like cranks, but they represent a sizable portion of the American public. And even in the polls, where a majority support action on environmental issues and global warming, the vast majority of these people really don't understand what we are up against. I'm quite sure that if you worded the question to reflect the sacrifices that will have to be made to truly make a difference for the global environment, support would fall off. Way off. I've been advocating for environmental issues for my entire adult life, going back to 13 years old. In all that time I would have to say that nothing has really changed. A small percent of people, less than 10% really get it. Really understand science and are able to make the connection to global ecology. A big chunk in the middle sort of understand we have environmental problems and sort of realize we should do something about it, but nothing other than a base "we should do good and not bad" sort of thing. A solid chunk of the populace, maybe 30 or 40% in the US is actively anti-environmentalist. They equate environmentalism with counter-culturalism, socialism, atheism, and any other number of "degenerate" causes. And if you press the people in the middle, the ones with soft support for environmental issues, and force them to confront what the 10% understands, that it's not just a "thing" we can "fix", that it is a structural problem - that our very way of life is the source of the problem? No surprise here, they become anti-environmentalists. But our environmental problems get worse every year. It will take a dramatic event, some major ecological collapse, to get peoples attention. And I fear it will not be a dramatic reversible event, it will be the culmination of a long insidious decline. So it's a catch-22. If you don't press people it will take too long. If you do press them it will take forever. I don't know what the answer is. And personally, I've been ridiculed, discredited and marginalized; basically pushed aside and ignored. I've paid a personal price for my advocacy. Knowledge and insight can be a curse. Ignorance is bliss. Too late for that.

2016-03-29 01:21:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

neither they are organised nor they are grouped because due to low investment and lack of educational and practical experience they are unable to perform,due to lack of liquidity on any time of market slums they collapse,there cost of production is high so they are unable to compete there big automised rivals examples are romania,russia,ukrain,korea,japan,china have cnc and automated computerised machinery so the production level is many times higher then us

2006-11-23 20:24:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers