Instead of Joey which failed, which should it have been about?
Chandler and Monica and kids? or Chandler Monica Rachel and Ross? or other?
Or should there be no spinoff at all?
2006-11-18 17:42:00 · 7 answers · asked by Team Jolie-Pitt Aniston 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Television
It was kinda like when Three's Company became Three's a Crowd. The heart of the show was lost.
Friends was successful because of its ensemble cast, not any one actor. Joey just didn't have the Friends chemistry at all, and relied too heavily on Matt LeBlanc's charm to keep viewers, and while it worked for a while, ultimately it had nowhere to go.
My vote? No spin-off. It did help with Friends withdrawal, though!
2006-11-18 18:04:26 · answer #1 · answered by mithril 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First of all, Friends was such an amazing and unique show that having a successful spin off was near impossible. Second, Joey's story line was the least interesting and I can't believe it even lasted as long as it did. Third, Chandler, Monica, and the twins was the one story line that I would have liked to watch. I loved Monica, Chandler and their relationship, and I would have loved to see them raise their kids. It's really sad that Friends ended, it was such a great show!
2006-11-18 17:51:57 · answer #2 · answered by sunday girl 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I really think that there should not be a spinoff because spinoffs are never as good as the original show.
2006-11-18 17:58:48 · answer #3 · answered by Small Lady 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO Spin-Off at all -- EVER. The show Friends was pathetic and NOT in the least bit funny.
2006-11-18 18:57:40 · answer #4 · answered by sglmom 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Phoebe doing battle with her evil twin Ursula, and also raising the triplets to whom she gave birth.
2006-11-18 17:46:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No spin off at all.
2006-11-18 17:45:24 · answer #6 · answered by tootsie 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think phoebe would've been interesting
2006-11-18 17:49:57 · answer #7 · answered by elusive 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋