I am writing an essay that has to cover the statement " Some Practitioners say that when dealing with a conflict the win/win approach is the best approach.
I have covered the win/win, win/lose and the lose/lose approach and outcome. I have another 1000 words to fill.
what now? The only thing I could think of was strategies to implement during the conflict resolution process to acheive each outcome. help please!
2006-11-18 15:15:18 · 3 answers · asked by kate d 4 in Social Science ➔ Psychology
. Go beyond defining a win-win situation to give the principals involved in seeking a win-win solution.
1. Define what is a win for you and what is a bonus. You need to know going in what things you must achieve in negotiation and which ones would just be 'nice to have'.
2. Know what the other side has wants, or HAS to have. If you can determine what they must gain from the negotiation in order to reach an agreement, you can quickly determine whether it is possible to successfully negotiate. If you know that their absolute must is an absolute no-can-do for you, there is no point in entering into negotiation. By the same token, if that point you MUST win is one they CANNOT concede, there is negotiating to be done.
2006-11-18 16:35:49 · answer #1 · answered by PoppaJ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If it extremely is a reoccurring situation it extremely is inflicting the confrontations and he keeps brushing it off - then sure take a seat down and discern it out so it would not save taking place. If it extremely is little issues that do no longer remember and could no longer remember interior the destiny enable him brush it off. i'm additionally this form of individual who could extremely argue and get something out interior the open and resolved than have my guy be mad at me and deny being mad at the same time as saying no longer something is erroneous. I agree that decision and arguing is important. in any different case issues can only stew until they finally do come out and blow up extremely undesirable. Your guy would not look of the comparable approach. And that would not make him incorrect he only handles subjects in a distinctive way. My suggestion is to enable him brush aside the small stuff. As for the huge stuff, take a seat on it an afternoon until he's in a extra suitable approach and then carry it up in extreme (non-argumentative) verbal substitute. i think of this could be a stable compromise for the two considered one of your personalities.
2016-11-25 19:06:30 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Give them examples of wen how you can implement the win/win strategy (ussually has alot of comprimising) and what happens to the people when you do implent it and remember lots of details =]
2006-11-18 15:31:17 · answer #3 · answered by whay i lost my ?s 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋