Any job where strength is a major contributor in life or death situations. Infantry, fire fighting, some police work, things like that. Women are not as capable as men in doing that heavy work, period. If it were simply construction work, you could argue that the extra cost in time is compensated by equal opportunity. But if lives are at stake, nothing justifies giving a job to a woman that a man could do better, PC bullcrap or no.
Women should have just as much opportunity to do a job that down not require huge physical exertion, but if the job requires you to lift people out of burning buildings to save their lives and yours, it is idiotic to give it to a woman simply because she IS a woman.
2006-11-18 21:00:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by ZenPenguin 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
any inwhich they feel they should have special privileges because they are women thus feeling as though they dont have to do certain jobs or be in danger (as many jobs require). Otherwise no. However a job that requires a lot of strength like being a firefighter I think might be one that they (women) should stay away from. I cant really see a woman carrying a 180 lb person over their shoulder and out the door of a burning building. Bottom line is, women can do 99% of jobs that men can do - the 1% the jobs that require alot of strength and stamina in a crisis environment is one in which it would be more practical for them to stay away from especially if they want special exceptions or privileges.
2006-11-18 15:08:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by wildhair 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Soooo many shapes, sizes, strength levels, and intellects. If a woman is fit to do a a job, then she should be abled to.
Why declare all woman crack under combat. Many have nerves of steel, but some may not...just like men. Men can't handle seeing women under fire??? That's a weak statement. Those men are trained for everything they do out there. How hard would it be to train for that too? Women have great intuition and could be a great asset in combat...
Like I said if she can do the job, her sex should have nothing to do with it.
2006-11-18 16:57:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I seriously doubt that there is not a woman somewhere that can do any job that a man can do.However some women seem to think that certain professions are not really suitable.Unlike some men,who would do absolutely anything for a couple of bucks,many women actually get jobs they like,that pay good money.
2006-11-18 15:25:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by mystic_master3 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
Their are no professions that women should be excluded from. If she has the willingness and the ability for any job than she has to be taken seriously. Women themselves have to know what they are capable of and know their limitations. Their are no professions left that I can think of that women are excluded from today. The only that I know is that the Catholic Church have turn down women to be priest.
2006-11-18 15:15:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by VLEEKS47 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Dated a stripper, substitute into great. continually had pocket money and he or she had warm acquaintances who enjoyed to occasion, the full "they circulate abode with clientele element" is hilarious, from what I observed it on no account occurred. I date a occupation women individuals now, she is great. i'm getting countless time for myself, without arguments approximately money. the female works 9 to 9 5 days a week and that i see her plenty. I dont think of i could have a venture with something the female does extremely, yet howdy I have been given a existence so i like a women individuals with a existence. *shrug.
2016-11-25 19:06:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Combat. I, having fought in Viet Nam, know that many men would become terrible unhinged seeing women subjected to some combat wounds. I know that there are woman being wounded in Iraq now, but not nearly at the level they would be wounded and killed in a combat position, such as infantry. Now, with a volunteer force, you see what kind of man is in the infantry. I do not think this would be a good " marriage " at all.
2006-11-18 15:28:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I would say construction... because we are too good to get down and dirty... also fire fighters, I would rather be rescued by a big macho guy than a woman that won't be able to lift me... of course in both of the lines of these works there are exceptions, but not many...
2006-11-18 16:47:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by ILuvMe 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I kinda think fire fighting, because they can't lift as much, and that could be really bad- if I was stuck in a fire, I would defiantly want men doing the job, but if they can meet the real strength requirements then I guess it would be fine
2006-11-18 16:37:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Without playing games, don’t be available 100% of the time or let your life be an open book. A man that comes on too strong or doesn’t have outside interests will scare a woman away just as much as it would if the circumstances were reversed. Read here http://AttractAnyWoman.emuy.info/?49mX
Women don’t want to feel as though they are completely responsible for your happiness and that is what it feels like when the other person has no outside interests. Men who are overeager or jump when the woman says jump are the ones who are more likely to end up in the friend zone. This doesn’t mean that you should play the game of not calling for a few days; it means that you should set healthy boundaries until you both naturally find a spot for the other in your lives.
2017-02-16 06:57:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by Vaughan 3
·
0⤊
0⤋