Is it possible to analyze these equalities logically, scientifically or philosophically?

Question

1. Partless part = partless whole.
2. Equivalenceless equivalence = equivalenceless difference.
3. Boundless bound = boundless tie.
4. Influenceless influence = influenceless sensation.
5. Originless origin = originless derivative.
6. Choiceless choice = choicelsess determinant.
7. Intentless intent = intentless fufillment.

Answer 1

less is comon at the end in all 7 statements..

Answer 2

a) to use logic isn't necessarily to analyse..if someone makes the statement 'you get soup or salad with your meal,' they've used logic but they haven't analysed anything.

b) all of those "equalities" are nonsense. who knows what an originless origin is? And the asking of the question is understandable, but the attempt to assign truth values to these batches of chopped jargon by some quasi-philosopher is shameful.

Answer 3

To analyze is to use logic.

(1) is true (a whole part)
(2) is false (impossible)
(3) is true (i.e., wave and ocean)
(4) is false (at most 'sensation' is a subset of 'influence')
(5) is false ('origin' is incompatible with 'derivative')
(6) and (7) are nonsense

Answer 4

I think that logic and scientific reasoning kick in and rule out the opportunity of philosophical contemplation, because it seems that each statement is out of balance, as each one appears to be, 0 = something. It seems logical that the negative/positive on one side must be 0. What do you think?

Answer 5

????????? They look like all three methods can be used on each one after you get finished defining the entities. These will be great at small parties when things get boring or on pub night instead of the mindless jock tv. They are so deep that I think pub night will give the most enlightened verdicts.

WOW

Answer 6

Logically and philosophically

Answer 7

all, you shall see. but to do it scientifically, you must also study human psychology and probability of circumstance.