Do you think Michael Jackson is innocent?

Question

After reading that the woman who accused him of molesting her child was busted for lying, basically...and reading about what a con she is/was, I began to wonder about MJ. Maybe she DID do it for the money! What do YOU think?

And yes, it's odd that he hangs with little kids...but he never did have a childhood. Maybe he just needs a shrink!

Answer 1

Uh, no, I don't think for a moment MJ is innocent.

If prosecution witnesses were all angels, we'd have a lot more convictions. Unfortunately, mere mortals are always at the heart of everything of human construct (like our legal system), and we're going to have people with skeletons in their closets being part of criminal cases.

Lots of people don't have childhoods. They don't open up theme parks and have "sleepovers" for kids 30+ years younger than themselves. *shudder*

Answer 2

NO! While I agree that some people would lie to get money, it is obvious that he is really a mentally ill person! Any grown man that thinks it is okay to share a bed with little boys (and I am not talking about a parent sharing a bed for legitimate reasons, like lack of space, or a nightmare etc) has pedophilia to some degree. He was also abused as a child and abused children often (not always) grow up to be abusers. I mean, holy jeez, just LOOK at the guy!

Answer 3

I believe he did it because no matter how much you lie and how desperate you are for money NO parent would ever lie about their child being sexually abused. You have to look at it in the eyes of a child........the harassment he will get all his life because he was molested is enough to make any child say NOWAY i am not saying that. We all know Michael is demented and someday somebody famous ( home alone) will come out and admit he was molested by Michael and he will get his just reward.

Answer 4

Hmmm, I'm not so sure "the people" have indeed spoken. I'm pretty sure you would find out what the people really think by polling mothers of young children to see if they would allow their child to visit the ranch.
I like to think I can abstain from judgment towards ANY other without absolute evidence of wrongdoing, much less Michael... but I would be less than honest if I said I'd let my child go for a weekend.

Answer 5

I never thought he would do anything to harm those little children to begin with. Yes it is a little odd and strange that somebody with that much money would have a fairty tale ranch and stuff but i guess he truly loves the children and wants a smile. As for as that woman who was a con yea stuff like that happens alot and they just want money from rich people. But i doubt he did anything.

Answer 6

Yeah, he's guilty. He knows exactly what he is doing and is a master at manipulation to get what he wants. He knows how to cast doubt and which child to prey upon. He has had a childhood all of his adult life. No excuses there. Is he still in Bahrain? Wonder why...mmm...

Answer 7

Guilty

Answer 8

I think he is guilty. Why has he never had a relationship with a woman for any reason other than to have kids.

Answer 9

Yes - he is guilty - but the only people who dare to accuse a "star" are the nutso people who gave him their kids for sex and then thought he would pay them forever. When they found out he was not making lifelong monthly payments to support them as the slugs they are, they cried wolf without proof. But yes. he is as guilty as sin and god will get him for that.

Answer 10

He needs more than just a shrink. He lives in his own lost world.