2006-11-18 12:58:01 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Games & Recreation ➔ Video & Online Games
I ment future
2006-11-18 12:59:06 · update #1
if you look at the trend.... probably...
but ps3 already has heat issues so to make it thinner any time soon would be like throwing water in an grease fire.
they would have to fix the heat issue AND remove the power supply from inside the unit
future, your thinking about 5 yrs from now.
officially there's no word... the thing came out yesterday.. the have to sell a few tens of millions before even considering
2006-11-18 13:03:01 · answer #1 · answered by firewolf_006 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, he's no longer precise. the only purpose the stressful force length served for PS2 playback replaced into to discover particular PS3 fashions without using their style type. The means does no longer propose something. I see you're foreign places, so on your case, there is largely one console that performs PS2 video games, that's the 60 GB chum unit. This style replaced into the resembling the 80 GB NTSC style for the NTSC areas and got here as the two a MGS4 equipment deal or Motorstorm equipment deal. the different 2 PS2 well suited fashions are the 20 GB and 60 GB, yet lower back, those are basically for the NTSC areas. All PS3s play PS1 video games through fact all of them have a PS1 application emulator. if your situation is PS1, then you quite can only purchase any console you spot, yet once you desire to play PS2 video games, you are able to seem for the specified console.
2016-12-10 11:30:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would just make sense that eventually, Sony would improve the technology and be able to make a smaller unit. It still amazes me how much smaller the PS2 got.
2006-11-18 13:05:10 · answer #3 · answered by Nc Jay 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yeah it is already thinner u can buy in stores like toyrus for $900
2006-11-18 13:14:12 · answer #4 · answered by Chunky Monkey 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
yeah probably, they have done it with the other 2 systems.
2006-11-18 13:05:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
maybe
2006-11-18 13:08:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
why?
2006-11-18 13:01:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋