YES, YES, YES... At least with my two she is. Into everything, sneaky, cunning, you name it, she does it. I call her my hellion. I can hardly wait until she is 15, dear Lord help me.
2006-11-18 13:48:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Melissa R 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I haven't had my second yet(hopefully in the next couple of weeks, im 37 weeks pregnant). But I do know that I wasn't mischevious, and I was the second child. My brother on the other hand was and he was the first. My mom only had two.
2006-11-18 21:36:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by ncaa_champs_05 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I dont know about that. I have a 1-1/2 year old girl, and she is the terror of the house, i doubt my second will be this evil and sly(of course she isnt evil, but she is a crafty little thing)
2006-11-18 21:06:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Holly M 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
My second child was an angel. It's the 3rd for me who is mischevious.
2006-11-18 20:50:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by mommysrock 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
it depends on how many children you have. If it is your youngest, according to studies yes the youngest is mischevious. If it is a middle child, not necessarily, they just tend to be rebellious.
2006-11-18 20:55:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by melissa 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, the first, second, third. All of them are. Some are better at not getting caught.
2006-11-18 21:16:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by ascendent2 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's stupid. I'm the second child. It's the 3rd.
2006-11-18 21:01:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by shiny and late 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No.
2006-11-18 20:50:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋