what is the difference being without foreskin?
2006-11-18 11:34:55 · 17 answers · asked by Kieron B 1 in Health ➔ Men's Health
You should have your circumcision based on clinical need.... is your foreskin too tight? Does it interfere with a normal sex life? Are you getting repeated urine infections or posthitis (inflammation of foreskin)?
The benefits of circumcision are mainly hygeine related, there is no "pocket" for bacteria and virus' to flourish in when circumcised. "Roundheads" are slightly less likely to pick up sti's than "Cavaliers".
I like my hood.... it keeps me warm in winter and my missus likes it as well.
2006-11-18 11:54:39 · answer #1 · answered by sean 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The foreskin is one of the most sensitive parts of your body. If it is cut off, it's gone forever, and you will never have the same kind of sexual pleasure that an intact man has. Your partner will also have less pleasure. You will never be a whole man again.
Some people think it looks cuter, but that is so incredibly shallow! The foreskin has a purpose beyond giving pleasure - it protects the glans (the head of the penis) from rubbing on clothing. The constant friction of cloth on a cut penis hardens the head, making it still less sensitive - so much so that many cut men cannot ejaculate from vaginal sex alone and must pull out and masturbate to get satisfaction.
Your parents were enlightened enough to leave you whole. It would be an incredibly masochistic act to ruin it now. Oh, yes, it hurts, too. You'll be sore for about a month and have to be careful not to get aroused, as that can be extremely painful. Just leave it alone and be thankful you're intact.
The cut guys will tell you that you should be incomplete because they are, but they don't know how an uncut man feels - they just think they are perfect. But in reality YOU are perfect the way nature made you - don't mutilate your penis.
2006-11-18 21:41:36 · answer #2 · answered by Maple 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It really doesnt matter. They say that you are more sensitive when you are circumsized, but I dont know how true that is. Also, circumsized is easier to clean. Its easier to get STD's and other diseases with it uncircumsized. But its just a prefrence. If you have gone this long with out it done, im sure that your not missing anything.
2006-11-18 19:38:45 · answer #3 · answered by boit 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
its a bit cleaner but if you shower every day and make sure to pull the foreskin back completely and clean the glans, it's not an issue. Getting circumcised is not necessary and it makes it really hard to jerk off. This operation was devised a long time ago in an attempt to get boys to stop wanking.
2006-11-18 19:39:12 · answer #4 · answered by m-t-nest 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The only downside to circumcision is the costs of the medical examination. There are many upsides; however, recently new methods of self-circumcision have been found. You should look into it if you wish to avoid those costly medical bills. Take a look at this website: www.landoverbaptist.org/news0601/circumcise.html
2006-11-18 19:38:36 · answer #5 · answered by fernandobouregard 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I think you should go for it. I find the circumsized penis very attractive. The difference is simple. Uncircumised->torpedo, circumsized-> mushroom fun fun
2006-11-18 19:38:46 · answer #6 · answered by supermilf23 1 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Unless you're a Jewish baby, I wouldn't recommend it. Actually I wouldn't recommend it, full stop. It's a totally unnecessary and barbaric practice.
2006-11-18 19:40:13 · answer #7 · answered by Kango Man 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Just chop it off already and stop being a woos about it. for the sake of man just chop the whole damn thing off if your that worried about it!
2006-11-18 21:23:26 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
not too big of a difference, i just think it looks more attractive when guys dont have it though
2006-11-18 19:37:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
You are asking strangers that?
2006-11-18 19:39:01 · answer #10 · answered by notyou311 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋