Yes, because a great actor should be able to (and can) get in touch with any role. To see an actor who's (probably) not gay actually do a convincing job of playing someone who is gay, then that's even further proof of their talent.
Much like it would be someone nice playing a monster, someone not trans playing someone trans (like Felicity Huffman did with TransAmerica), and so on.
2006-11-18 11:51:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by Kimberley Mc 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
What is a part that is 'meant for gay actors'? I don't get that. No part is meant for anybody- as long as someone can convince you, they were made for that role.
2006-11-19 01:59:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think anyone, gay or straight, who truly understands the character enough to make me beleive they are the character, I support them. That's what acting is about, right? PLaying a character so well that everyone forgets they are not that person?
2006-11-18 20:15:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Phedre D 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Most straight actors do. Cuz, that's were the Oscar seems to be!
2006-11-18 19:36:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Namaste 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutely! How else will they ever get the chance to kiss a really hot guy?
2006-11-18 19:49:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mike 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
why not? that's why they call it acting.
2006-11-18 19:36:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by rollo_tomassi423 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sure, why not?
2006-11-18 21:50:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by joannaserah 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
sure.
its all good.
2006-11-18 20:37:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋