How does one's grades in school, equate with competency late in life ?
The list is very long, my friend, of folks who did poorly in school and later in life were geniuses. Nevermind the fact that even great grades, 4.0, is no indication of LEADERSHIP.
I don't know where to find those records, nor do I care. Sorry.
2006-11-18 10:58:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why does it matter who is the better Test taker. Some Instructor grade on volume of BS. Rarely is the grade based on understanding the subject. Even rarer is their any question that one is doing any thinking. Most test are based on how well you regurgitate the test writers philosophy.
Does knowing Names, Dates, & Places mean you have the slightest idea why certain people did what they did. I'm not taking the liberal route saying to give a pass for stupid actions. Knowing why those action were taken might either insure one doesn't create the same atmoshere.
Most likely Bill got better grades than George. Arafat still played Bill for all he could get. Bill thought he was doing good & he was just being used.
Hillary most like got better grades than both of them. Does that mean she would be a good president. She is a better manipulator. If She couldn't read that Bill was a womanizer Decades ago, what does that say about her ability to read other trained politians? If she did know & was in it just for the bennies what does that say about her ethics?
2006-11-18 19:18:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by viablerenewables 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Bill Clinton attended Georgetown undergradate, and Yale law. He was a Rhodes scholar and studied at Oxford. He didn't have the connections even to get into Georgetown; it was all on merit. Hillary, like Bill, came from a middle class family and went to Wellesley on the basis of grades and high school activities. She also went to Yale law, and undoubtedly had good grades to get in because laws schools in those days discriminated against women.
"In 1999, The New Yorker magazine published a transcript showing Bush had a cumulative grade average of 77 his first three years at Yale, and a similar average under a non-numerical rating system his senior year.
Bush's highest grade at Yale was an 88 in anthropology, history and philosophy. He received one D in his four years, a 69 in astronomy, and improved his grades after his freshman year, the transcript showed."
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/06/07/politics/main700170.shtml
2006-11-18 19:41:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by Skip F 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Just google it. I can tell you for certain that Bush was a C student at Yale and Bill and Hillary Clinton have always been remarkably intelligent.
2006-11-18 19:09:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
i can already tell you that both Hiliary and Bill are brilliant people. Getting into Ivy league schools is nothing but politics anyway. i don't care what George bush's grades were, he can't even speak a sentence correctly. I happen to know a young lady who was admitted to Yale because her father was a powerful senator...Her SAT scores were more than 300 points below her classmates who attended other colleges and went on to become professionals...such as MD., Wharton School of Finance, etc.
2006-11-18 19:34:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by tafttootsie 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Sorry, can't help you there, but my non-partisan bit of trivia recall is that Bill Clinton was, by far, the significantly better student than W.
2006-11-18 18:56:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by OU812 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Bush had better grades than Kerry at the same university.
I would bet that Hilary had the best grades of all???
2006-11-18 18:56:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by dj_of_raleigh 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
George Bush's daddy bought him his grades so whatever you find isn't going to prove much.
2006-11-18 18:56:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
Don't know about Bill & Hill.
But I know that Bush has a higher IQ than Gore & Kerry.
And Bush got better grades in college than they did.
No supprise.
2006-11-18 18:56:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
do you mean what grades in school they received( because academic acheivement doesn't mean someone is a good leader)
2006-11-18 18:58:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋