Ronald Reagan!!!!
2006-11-18 10:18:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
The politics and government section is the last hide out for refugees from the recent republican defeat.
It reminds me of travelling down river in the movie "Deliverance" I can hear the banjos plucking.
But I would have to say Bill Clinton. He is heads and tails above the poor leadership we are experiencing now!
2006-11-18 18:54:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by CoolLuke 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
1st choice Teddy Roosevelt
2nd choice Ronald Reagan
3rd choice JFK
2006-11-18 19:31:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by viablerenewables 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I was expecting to see a lot of people saying "Clinton," but I guess not....
I wouldn't mind Reagan. Or Lincoln, or perhaps FDR.
2006-11-18 18:26:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by Lanani 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Its hard to tell if these presidents you suggest would do much better. Dealing with Middle East politics is no cake walk.
I'll tell you this, though, if Nixon were in charge he would have ordered the bombing of five or six countries by now. After the most devastating terrorist attack in US history, Bush attacked TWO, just TWO, and Libya fell in line, everybody forgets that.
Things are not all bad. It could be a LOT worse.
2006-11-18 18:22:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by Action 4
·
5⤊
2⤋
Washington
2006-11-18 18:19:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by Milana P 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
Thomas Jefferson, hands down.
2006-11-18 19:46:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Ronald Reagan or Bill Clinton.....both very compassionate people
2006-11-18 19:42:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by tafttootsie 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Lincoln is the obvious answer, read Sandburg's books
2006-11-18 18:42:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Harry S. Truman
2006-11-18 19:06:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by stan l 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
from the first part of your question without putting in USA I would have said Macheavelli but since you said US I would go with FDR he wouldnt put up with this PC crap.
2006-11-18 18:21:01
·
answer #11
·
answered by CaptainObvious 7
·
5⤊
0⤋