I know he did a sequel to his Chanukah song, so what is the deal with not doing Happy Gilmore 2, or 50 second dates.
2006-11-18 09:10:38 · 15 answers · asked by Marky Mark 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
Some comedians can carry a movie all themselves, like jim carry, not sandler, he is not that talented.
2006-11-18 09:15:47 · answer #1 · answered by kam_1261 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Adam Sandler movies that NEED a sequel :
8 Crazy Nights
Little Nicky
The Waterboy
Billy Madison
Heck, most of his movies would be good with sequels, even though they are good in and of themselves - too many people are so stuck up that they think that just because Sandler's movies hit TOO CLOSE TO HOME FOR THEM that the movies are no good.
THEY JUST DON'T LIKE SEEING SOMETHING FROM THEIR OWN LIVES ON THE BIG SCREEN.
2006-11-18 09:35:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not likely.
He takes his charactersforward by using the same cast of characters in almost all his movies and in Rob Schneider's movies and in Norm Mc Donald's movies as well. They have each taken a turn as the devil, His friend have been in all his movies, plus he brings in Henry Winkler and Christopher Walken when he can. The only girl to repeat is Drew Barrymore and that was a sort of sequel in that Fifty First Dates was in response to the success of The Wedding Singer. And Carl Weather's character is in both Happy Gilmore and in Little Nicky. It is a little like Robert Smith and his films, the characters relate from movie to movie, excluding Punch Drunk Love that really was his worst movie ever.
2006-11-18 12:56:21 · answer #3 · answered by LORD Z 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How can any of you be asserting Shawn of the lifeless grew to become into undesirable? What a great movie, and the Rock and Boogie Nights? For shame.... the actual worst movies ever are Spiderman 3, Mortal Kombat: Annihilation, Sharknado, Shark attack 3: Megalodon (extra like the terrific movie ever), international war Z, Rocky V (Tommy Gunn!), Battlefield Earth, any of those god detrimental paranormal interest movies, Jason X (yet another movie that i actual surprising), and something on fearnet on call for or ANY movie produced or distributed via the asylum
2016-10-22 07:57:18 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nop, there is not anything saying about a sequel, and he doesnt have to,the movies are great where they are and always they do sequels that are just not necessary and turn out to be awful movies and suck
2006-11-18 09:14:32 · answer #5 · answered by jrishmawi2 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I really, really hope there will be a happy gilmore sequel! That is my favorite movie, and i think it rocks!
2006-11-18 09:12:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
uhhmm... because that would be a really dumb idea! only morons would watch that garbage! i would hope that he has more respect for trye comedy than that! and you should be ashamed of yourself for wanting him to make sequels! SHAME ON YOU!
2006-11-18 09:23:20 · answer #7 · answered by Curious Blair 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Are you kidding? That jackass has been making the same movie over and over for years! His popularity is an embarassing commentary on Americans' lack of anything even resembling good taste!
2006-11-18 09:13:23 · answer #8 · answered by hznfrst 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Because his movies usually end happily and resolved. I like them that way.
2006-11-18 09:12:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I hope not.
I'm sure he's a nice person in real life, but his movies do nothing for me.
2006-11-18 09:20:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋