English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-11-18 08:31:44 · 7 answers · asked by secretrainbow89 3 in Travel Other - Destinations

7 answers

Antarctica: You'll die of hypothermia and exposure far faster than you'll die of hyperthermia in Death Valley.

Okay, lets assume that you're in GOOD health, and that you're 'transported' to either location wearing what you'd be wearing on an average winter day... long pants, shoes, shirt, jacket, and a hat.

The monthly mean tempurature means at McMurdo Station ranges from 18.4°F in August to -26.6°F in January.

For Death Valley the highest average high temperature in July is 116 °F and can drop to freezing at night.

2006-11-18 08:57:14 · answer #1 · answered by mariner31 7 · 0 0

With no protective gear in either situation? I would say Antarctica. Even without water it's still somewhat possible to find shade as relief from the heat. When you're out on a solid block of ice though, you have nothing for shelter and the cold will get you faster than the dehydration will.

2006-11-18 08:41:46 · answer #2 · answered by desiderio 5 · 1 0

Death Valley...;

2006-11-18 08:38:43 · answer #3 · answered by huggz 7 · 0 0

Antarctica...

if you remove your gloves etc, and clothing that insulates you, you will freeze quicker than by dying of heat exhaustion in the valley.

2006-11-18 08:41:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

antartica, been to death valley alot, no big deal,in fact i grew up in 120 weather, played outside all day

2006-11-18 08:38:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

i think you would dehidrate and die faster in death valley. why?

2006-11-18 08:49:12 · answer #6 · answered by Jenna T 2 · 0 0

I'd say Antartica theres cold ice cracks you could fall into humongous blizzards.

2006-11-18 08:35:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers