English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i mean don't get me wrong..i wish them the best but there are a couple of things that seem backwards to me:

firstly, i think that first they should of got married and then had the baby...not the other way around.

secondly, they are already planning for a divorce with a prenup before they even said "i do"

Thirdly, they are way to public with there lifestyle...they should keep there life private because all its going to do is put a strain on their marriage. ie: just look at jessica and nick or what use to be of them.

i don't know maybe i have no idea what i'm talking about but, i think that down the road they are heading for a divorce or an unhappy marriage.

2006-11-18 07:51:39 · 7 answers · asked by Danielle B 1 in Entertainment & Music Celebrities

7 answers

it is so true, and katie is talller that backwards to.

2006-11-18 07:55:38 · answer #1 · answered by sherry s 1 · 0 1

1) a lot of people have babies without being married, sometimes when people rush into marriage just because they're having a baby it leads to problems down the line, because it is a forced thing. The fact that they're still getting married shows that it might actually be love.
2) people with as much money as Tom Cruise would be nuts not to sign a pre-nup
3) people are interested in them, i dont think they are purposefully putting themselves out there, i might be wrong though

I don't think any of these things are that bad, sometimes people forget that it's our differences that make life interesting, and if everyone was the same life would be really boring.

2006-11-18 08:05:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

seem, it somewhat is a properly wide-unfold certainty among Hollywood circles, that Tom Cruise is gay. He has a tremendously experienced exposure group (different than whilst they allowed him to act tremendously bizarrely on Oprah, etc this 12 months....). yet his occupation is on the edge of tatters and this attempt at a 'wedding ceremony' extravaganza is info of a guy desirous to regain his former point of stardom. the situation is, that the internet is this manner of subversive motor vehicle - his publicists can no longer administration the spreading of suggestions by potential of it - no longer basically like the print and tv media. i think of the clarification that Tom Cruise is transforming into so unpopular, is the certainty that he is going to such lengths to show that he's at as quickly as....which he's no longer. certainly everyone seems to be ill of actors performing of their lives faraway from the show screen. Why no longer basically pop out and supply up all the charades? different actors are brazenly gay and nonetheless very valuable.

2016-12-10 11:23:32 · answer #3 · answered by money 4 · 0 0

firstly many couples these days have the baby and then get married,i suppose most of them have prenups too,but what is the point of having a prenup,are they expecting their marriage not to work out and they are celebs they are use to all the publicity,i suppose we mere commoners haven't a clue.

2006-11-18 08:02:10 · answer #4 · answered by ladycindy1701 3 · 0 1

Yeah, I don't understand why they already got a prenup. If I was Katie, I'd feel really insecure about it and I would feel like it really wouldn't last 'til death. They know that it could be a possibility.

It's really all too strange.

2006-11-18 08:01:12 · answer #5 · answered by J13891 4 · 0 1

i agree...this iz y hollywood marriages fall apart

2006-11-18 08:18:51 · answer #6 · answered by [dANiiE♥♫]™ 5 · 0 1

who's tom and katie?

2006-11-18 08:41:10 · answer #7 · answered by ? 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers