When his then wife objected, he went to court to get legal permission for his lover (now his current wife) to stay with him in the house where his wife and son lived.
2006-11-18 07:34:49 · 20 answers · asked by childrenofthecorn 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
His personal conduct should absolutely be considered. It speaks very loudly to the character of this man. Do you want someone of this morality leading our country? He made a vow to spend the rest of his life with his wife. He was not even decent enough to end things with her before taking up with someone else. Can anything he says be beileved? I think not.
2006-11-18 07:47:42 · answer #1 · answered by Sheri 2 · 6⤊ 1⤋
Maybe, but if they really wanted to address something more substantial, it would be why he helped ship all the leftover steel from 9/11 overseas before the investigation was even started.
From a forensics point of view, this was the greatest destruction of evidence in the history of our country. What was the reason for this? Why the rush? Was there something he was hiding?
2006-11-18 09:29:09 · answer #2 · answered by Rob in NY 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Great question! I remember it well, around the same time he was appearing on-stage in a dress,lol. But I believe that Mr.Clintons well publicized "romp". Will be the focal point as reason to overlook it and focus on his post 9/11 actions.
2006-11-18 07:40:28 · answer #3 · answered by Daddy 6 · 9⤊ 0⤋
alot of people will remember him walkin toward the burning twin towers on 9-11 but the liberal biased media will turn make him look like a monster. :O
2006-11-18 15:24:11 · answer #4 · answered by rgrclms22 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It shouldn't be, but you can bet any amount of money it will come up. After all, those aren't true Republican conservative values. That along with his stance on abortion will keep him from getting the Republican presidential nomination. He's wasting his time and money.
2006-11-18 07:54:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
Oh my is he actually going to run for President? Thats hilarious.
He is a dirty little man to toss his wife aside like that. So much for family values.
2006-11-18 07:37:46 · answer #6 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 8⤊ 2⤋
Haha...I know. Both him and ole Newt! Who also has mentioned running.
Will be awfully difficult to claim the moral high ground on that one!
2006-11-18 07:44:11 · answer #7 · answered by kissmybum 4 · 8⤊ 1⤋
Yes, but most people will remember him for his valor during 9/11
2006-11-18 07:39:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 2⤋
People will consider it. The ones who like him will not care. The ones who don't will.
Pretty much politics as usual.
Clinton lied under oath, people. Remember?
2006-11-18 07:56:44 · answer #9 · answered by ? 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
LOL. its okay that Gerry Studds molested a minor but Foley sends an email and hes a low life. Its okay Clinton is an adulterer but Giuliani is terrible. I dont understand you guys.
and the funny thing is Giuliani is a Dem with an R next to his name and they still attack him. lol
For me no, none of them are okay. I dont think its okay mass is represented by a drunk killer in Kennedy, I dont think anybody who cant handle their own personal affairs should be in charge of handling the countries affairs. No matter what letter is next to their name
2006-11-18 07:56:23 · answer #10 · answered by CaptainObvious 7 · 0⤊ 5⤋