Is this a new low in "stereotyping" for this group? Who, or what, is next?
Should we now hate everyone in Mississippi because they keep sending past and current Racist Trent Lott to the Senate?
2006-11-18 05:11:08 · 21 answers · asked by thehiddenangle 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Well have you been to San Francisco lately?...j/k
2006-11-18 05:12:55 · answer #1 · answered by Hi 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Us conservatives value traditional ways of life, and San Francisco has made every effort to become pro-choice, pro-gay/lesbian, anti-military, and the list goes on forever. I would love to visit SF and see the sights, but not when I have to be afraid of what my kids will see that will throw all of the values I've instilled in them out the window. I don't find SF a very moral city, and any city that is anti-military shouldn't even be a part of this country. I mean how can you be anti-military? What happens when SF gets attacked, or has a natural disaster? Who do you think the first people called in to help will be? You got it, our all mighty MILITARY! God Bless them! SF is just way too liberal for the average american trying to raise a family with traditional values.
2006-11-18 08:24:25 · answer #2 · answered by sicilia 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Who could have imagined that by electing a congressperson who represented her district well, the whole town and culture could come under attack.
The Republican logic is that Pelosi is defined by her representation of San Francisco, and San Francisco [liberal homosexual] values will come to dominate the Democratic Party. Armegeddon is at hand! This is so much more dangerous for the US than invading and occupying any Muslim country!
Ruth, formerly Ruth the meanie, says: " Conservative SF'er's provide our ammo.". So true! Thank you for your honesty and transparency.
2006-11-18 05:49:33 · answer #3 · answered by Red Herring 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the United States were to adopt San Fransisco's "defense" plan, we would now all be Islamic and speaking Arabic - or dead.
Their attitudes and loyalty to America's ideals are clearly off the chart - they live in a little bubble of ignorant bliss, totally unaware that the rest of the country is bleeding for their freedom to be total douche bags.
2006-11-18 05:42:30 · answer #4 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Because San Francisco has become the standard bearer for such things as taking "under God" out of the Pledge of Alliegence, banning the ROTC in schools, teaching children how to masturbate in kindergarten, etc., etc.
SF public schools have some nerve banning the ROTC because it's a "military" club, sponsering "government ideals," etc., when they get their funding through the Federal government.
It's not a matter of gay marriage or a gay population. It's not a matter of "tree huggers" or "save the whalers" or any of those other things that most liberals identify themselves with that liberals IMAGINE conservatives, such as myself, persecute them.
The problem is that a very small minority in this country is trying to tell the majority of this country what to do, how to be, and what they believe. You want to be an atheist? Fine with me. But why do I have to be one? You want to be able to practice your beliefs in public (that there is no God), fine with me, but why can't I practice my beliefs in public (that there IS a God).
Why should the gay community -- a very small minority group as opposed to the very large heterosexual group -- get special constitutional rights BECAUSE of their sexual practices? I don't get special constitutional rights. I have a handicapped child and I am afforded no more rights than anyone else, and in some cases, I get LESS rights because my choices for her are far more limited because of her handicap. But you don't see scores of politicians fighting for the educational rights of handicapped children because they're too busy fighting for the SEXUAL rights of homosexuals. Don't you think that's just a little bit off kilter?
Banning the ROTC? Banning military recruiters from campuses? It's those very military personnel that provide you the right to say and do the things that you want, and you treat them as if they are third class citizens, as if they're as bad or worse than criminals?
Trent Lott made some less-than-thought-out remarks about Strom Thurmond a few years back -- repugnant, yes. But everyone in Hollywood and elsewhere is ready to line up and kiss John Kerry's A55 for denegrating our military and questioning their collective intelligence?
Mel Gibson says some ugly things about Jews -- repugnant, yes. But Elton John, Bill Mahar and other liberal elitests can publically scorn and ridicule Christians and everyone claps their hands and cheers?
You want to save the spottel owl, but it's perfectly okay to kill a baby as it's being born? Or just when it's got arms and legs and is kicking and you already know it's a boy or a girl? Or just when it has a heartbeat? I guess that makes it okay, right?
You act like you want a level playing field, but the reality is, you want a playing field that is built on the bones and blood of the very people who made this nation what it is, going so far as to say that this nation and its policies is wicked and should fall more in line with Europe -- the most war-torn region in the world -- war after war after war throughout the centuries, far more than the Middle East. And a people who have systematically stood around and done NOTHING while innocent Jews, Homosexuals, Handicapped, Gypsies, Elderly, and any other number of people were taken out and slaughtered as if they were worth nothing to anyone.
Socialism sounds great on paper, the problem is is it doesn't work in practice. Ask China. Ask Russia. Ask anyone who's lived it.
San Francisco values? Those are the values of the ultra liberals. If you don't like being branded with them . . . move. That's what I did -- and not because I don't like being called names. I actually got fired from my job. Why? Because I had a Bible IN my desk and my boss didn't find that to be "appropriate reading material."
2006-11-18 06:05:23 · answer #5 · answered by Rebecca 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I love San Francisco just not all the people the world is over crowded
2006-11-18 05:40:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
How about those BrokeBack Montana Cowboys that voted a Democrat in to Office.
Redsters will most likely start attacking Montana ranchers.
Go big Red Go
2006-11-18 05:15:01 · answer #7 · answered by 43 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Because we are sick of arrogant liberals who feel they have the right to tell everyone what to do.
Specifically, the San Fran city council banned ROTC. They should have all federal funding eliminated immediately. People join ROTC and the military of their own free will.
Secondly, the gay marrying mayor Gavin Newsome. He stuck his nose at the marriage laws. He should be in jail. You do not get to break a law because you do not like it.
Thirdly, the homeless situation there is out of control. The city gives hand me outs like water.
2006-11-18 05:14:22 · answer #8 · answered by GOPneedsarealconservative 4 · 5⤊ 1⤋
We aren't. I haven't heard a single conservative attack the people in San Jose.
2006-11-18 08:13:38 · answer #9 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
because for the most part, San Francisco is full of asses.
2006-11-18 05:15:37 · answer #10 · answered by Huevos Rancheros 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋