2006-11-18 04:59:33 · 7 answers · asked by BOO! 2 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
I do not like to listen to him. David R says 'he's good for TV' and it troubles me that that is what is considered 'good TV.' I much prefer the calm, analytical process of the good analysts.... the same reason I can't stand Bill Walton on pro hoops... all hype, very little in the way of substance.
2006-11-18 05:15:39 · answer #1 · answered by jh 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do. He's great for TV though. He's got a good personality and knows a lot of the history of the game. They need to get someone other than Big-10 guys on there though.
That idiot, never-was (not really a has-been) Buckeye QB needs to go.
2006-11-18 13:04:31 · answer #2 · answered by David R 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He might be, but that puts him at least 15 steps up the evolutionary ladder from Lou Holtz.
2006-11-18 13:47:23 · answer #3 · answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
haha yeah. he ALWAYS picks against ohio state, and that alone makes me dislike him
2006-11-18 13:31:16 · answer #4 · answered by coolness 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
for sure...dude, i love your questions..allways choice material.
Long live the king of darkness!
2006-11-18 13:07:35 · answer #5 · answered by Doctor J. 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
sounds accurate
2006-11-18 13:54:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
YOU ARE THE ONLY ONE.
2006-11-18 15:30:39 · answer #7 · answered by smitty 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋