2006-11-18 03:49:18 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Too bad he cant get a hard on like the rest of the republicans, which is why all of the republicans got so pissed off at Clinton when they found out what he had done.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thaks for being stupid firestorm
2006-11-18 03:51:04 · answer #1 · answered by smartass 3 · 3⤊ 6⤋
I don't think anyone should be impeached for getting a b.j. Impeachment should be reserved for the most heinous of crimes against the country and the office of President. After the Monica Lewinsky scandal, impeachment (which was once barely mentioned in American politics) is a word thrown around every time one side disagrees with the other.
2006-11-18 12:09:18 · answer #2 · answered by stk1990 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush will never be impeached, because he never did anything deserving of impeachment. If your little democratic mind can remember so looong ago, 98% of the Senate and House voted to go to war based on the same intelligence the president had. So, if your going to impeach Bush, your going to have to impeach 98% of all politicians. Actually not a bad idea. Lets dump all of them and start over with new blood on both sides. Repeat after me... Term Limits Good.... Lifetime politicians bad.
2006-11-18 11:56:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋
Impeachment doesn't actually remove the President from office. Nixon was impeached but resigned. Anyway, he's only got 1 more year in office so hang in there.
2006-11-18 11:53:51 · answer #4 · answered by wmponygirl 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Clinton was impeached for lying to Congress.
George W. Bush has lied to Congress about more serious things, but his Republican cronies won't impeach him. Besides, if Bush was impeached and thrown out of office, Cheney would become President! Better we just wait it out for two years. -RKO-
2006-11-18 12:16:02 · answer #5 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Only If he was to commit perjury over it, like Clinton did.Why do you moronic Libs think getting a BJ was what got Clinton impeached? Shows how clueless you people really are..
2006-11-18 12:01:39 · answer #6 · answered by BAARAAACK 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I didn't agree with the impeachment of clinton for it nor would i aprove of the impeachment of bush over personal matters.
2006-11-18 11:53:35 · answer #7 · answered by Eric B 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋
W. wouldn't accept the BJ. Besides, Clinton was impeached and didn't step down from the office of President.
2006-11-18 11:54:38 · answer #8 · answered by answer annie 5 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Lol.
He wasn't impeached for the ******** he was impeached for lying about the ********. Republicans apparently didn't think fighting terrorism was a major problem during this time so they wasted alot of time trying to bring Clinton down.
They failed at that too.
2006-11-18 11:52:12 · answer #9 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 3⤊ 5⤋
His name ain't Bill Clinton and he does have principals, whether people believe it or not.
Consider that all Presidents, get up everyday, knowing at almost half of the people in the US hate them, a majority of the world hates them because America is so prosperous, and that the media is always looking to throw mud at them.
Every President we have had, if you look at the before swearing in and when they left office, they age many years. Look at Bill, Look at Carter.
2006-11-18 11:53:00 · answer #10 · answered by bigmikejones 5 · 6⤊ 2⤋
You can't get impeached for getting a ********.
2006-11-18 11:58:27 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋