Who thinks all Western countries should follow The Netherland's lead and ban Muslim face masks...?

Answer 1

Face Masks only for women is cruelty and uncivilized. We in 21st century welcome ban of such a medieval practice. In Turkey, Muslim women do not use burqa, why the Muslims who protest against Netherlands go there and insist, since it is an Islamic state.

Answer 2

It is sad but had the PC mob and the EU kept out of all this, who would care. It has been made an issue by politicians and do gooders. I agree if you cannot wear western clothes in Muslim countries why should they wear theirs here.

Answer 3

i think of of Syria a Muslim united states has understand for women's Rights in assessment to maximum distinctive Muslim international places this is the two Intimidating with the help of way of certainty the Veil Itself like France Syria could desire to choose to limit all Veils on Muslim women as of now this is a start up up of going indoors the terrific direction.

Answer 4

I was just about to ask this question, i think a total ban is virtually needed. In places where huge crowds gather, where extremist bombers are likely to strike, full veils should not be worn, who knows who is lurking beneath it. In our schools and hospitals, they should also be banned. As young british children dont need to see or understand the repressive nature of such garments. And in hospitals, patients surely want to see fully who is prodding them about, older people like to see who they converse with.

They should be allowed, probably, in there own places of worship, as the male members like to see the repressive garments, hiding their wives from other men. These women must surely be the most attractive in the world, to command such insecure jealousy from their husbands.

Whether the veil is banned or not, just be glad, and proud that we show our women respect. Something a muslim women will never get from their men.

Answer 5

No matter what you think or what your religion is, Muslim face masks should be banned in any public venue. If the governments continue to allow individuals to wear the masks in places such as the bus, the bank, train stations etc, it isnt going to take certain criminals long before they decide to wear one to commit crimes. If you cant ID a person because a majority of their face is hidden, then youre screwed. I feel that you can practice any sort of religion you want unless it infringes on my right as a person, not as a Christian or Muslim or whatever you are.

Answer 6

Yes please,common sense at last, lets all stick together and ban this non religious peace of male dominating clothing.

If muslim men can't respect there women or have the balls to allow them to be seen in public then they all deserve to be lonely and single...,,,

Answer 7

I'm surprised that The Netherlands banned anything. It's tempting to say yes, but there is the issue of religious freedom. Tough call.

Answer 8

Tough call...Holland has not banned them. It was only proposed by the current government. It is easy to knee jerk and say yes or say no because it sounds outrageous. However, Holland had a leading filmmaker stabbed to death in public clearly linked to a film that was viewed by some Muslims as outrageous. If this started happening here, I would be more likely to support a ban. At this point, I believe removal for identification purposes is enough.

Answer 9

I do.
Aside from being a definite terrorist means of perpetrating evil, putting a woman in a tent with two holes for her eyes is NOT acceptable in our societies. And WE are still in the majority!
When in Rome,...........
I don't see ANY reason why we (the West) should be forced to accept their customs.
Sorry, my Muslim Brothers and Sisters, but you are pissing us off with your misplaced 'outrage' over us not being comfortable with your customs straight from the Dark Ages, and it has nothing to do with religion, it is used as a means of oppressing women.

Answer 10

Great idea! Thinking of that lawyer in England who tried to plead her client's case wearing a niqab: the judge couldn't hear her; he couldn't see her facial expression to judge her sincerity; if there was a stenographic record to be made the stenographer couldn't read her lips -- an important aspect of stenographic recording. No wonder the judge threw her out of his court. (Or, rather, her law firm withdrew her.)

In Islamic countries where those costumes are worn women are in purdah, so to speak: they do not participate in the economic and political life of the nation. These Muslims can't have it both ways.