Was anyone else bored with "Children in Need" last night. & is it about time Wogan gave up?

Question

I'm honestly not being mean - I have a special Hospice to whom I give generously but I just thought it was so dire last night - all the same - can;t they do something different?

Answer 1

It was dull,I'll give you that.The format really needs looking into. As for Terry Wogan he is one of the Trustees of "Children in Need " who are legally responsible for the charity,make the final decisions on grant applications,and take legal responsibility for grant-making."Children in Need" is classed as Terry Wogans "baby",as he is charged with making the "appeal" popular with viewers, since he became involved in the appeal in the early seventies.We must remember, all involved give their services free.Whilst agreeing it was somewhat dull,compared to previous years,it surely is a great event,and does show the generosity of the British public. Contrary to what some say,there ARE individual children's charities in this country,which rely on public donations only.Long may "Children in Need" continue,but with some changes!!

Answer 2

its ok in parts but gos on a bit too long and most of the musics good but the formats dated and i dont think there is anyone who can fill terry wogans boots when it comes to charity donations on television.
its one show thats good for charity but the bbc donates to many hours to it and the show needs a major revamp and shortened to about 2 hours long one at beginning of night and one at midnight theres enough fund raising gos on throughout the weeks running up to the show why take up so many hours on something so old its almost past its sell by date.

Answer 3

C+. I enjoyed the racing yet there became no longer plenty component by utilising component. After Brad placed Kyle into the wall i became satisfied he got here back to offload him. the only reason I gave it a b became because of the fact of my drivers. Kahne-NO Newman-NO Allgier-NO. And if Newman became nevertheless in the race i'd have enjoyed to ascertain him unload Joey final nighttime! Now he can no longer because of the fact he can no longer even threat ruining his cup automobile because of the fact he's making an attempt to get into the chace.

Answer 4

yes i was bored too. used to watch it all the way through every year but the last couple of years have not been so good, i even switched off last night, only switched back on when my daughter texted me to tell me Westlife were on and by the time i switched it on they had almost finished!! watched a bit more then went to sleep!!!

Answer 5

I know it's all for a good cause but I stopped watching years ago cause it tends to make me cringe. I did donate some money however - a guy at work was letting people cut off chunks of his hair for a pound.

Answer 6

i find the whole program totally boring dose my **** in but it is good to raise money for children cant they do it another way without taking the whole BBC1 on the night i missed Eastenders cos of it

Answer 7

the thing is its the same format for comic relief

you know what t0o expect and it just isnt funny anymore we switched over at about 7:15 after the said what was on and switched back after midnight.

Answer 8

yes i,m fed up with children in need and terry wogan,there are no children in need in this country ,all are well fed and looked after the money raised goes to stupid projects. children in need just keeps terry wogan and other has beens in a very over paid job,i stay in on children in need night cos i am fed up with people pushing cans in my face wanting money after i have been at work all day.

Answer 9

i thot it was ok but like all chariti tv thingis it was dull
i like wogans abs in the advert tho :)
hehe maybe not...

Answer 10

I'm so bored from so many years of it that for once I was grateful to Sky!