He should look at this when his Presidency is up..
2006-11-18 01:58:59 · 20 answers · asked by BAARAAACK 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes and you can bet UN resolutions would get reinforced, instead of the present UN leader that has no backbone and will not take a stand!!!!! Bush does what is right not what is popular and that is what the UN needs!!!!
2006-11-18 02:04:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
G.W.Bush and Tony Blair to take over at the U.N.from
Kofi annan PERFECT if you want to start the war to
bring about the end of the World
2006-11-18 10:31:56 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. The Muslim meaning of Jihad means a war from within. A personal struggle with their own demons. The extremists have twisted this into a struggle from without and have transformed 15% of 1 billion Muslims into twisted madmen. The God fearing peaceful Muslims are a timid people and are threatened if they do not take an extremist point of view . They have little recourse since the supposed justified violence that an extremists perpetuates makes it easy for those of their ilk to gain power with in their regions. Remember the American revolution? Or the rise to power of Hitler whom only had 4% of the population behind him when he took the leadership role in Germany. Mien Kempf (my struggle) is the same as the word Jihad (my struggle within) yet has been twisted from without. A worldwide revolution has started and will not end even if we become isolationists once again. Let's not allow them to gain in strength. The ball is rolling so fast no amount of nations can stop it and the threat to our way of life is real and it's future as the world's future is a bleak one. All we can do is lessen the pain and death by nipping this the bud. GWB realizes this. So do the Democrats but they had to disagree with something so that they could gain power.
2006-11-18 10:02:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes absolutely! i strongly agree. George Bush should be in UN but Kofi Annan should be in presidency....is that ok for you?
2006-11-18 10:02:31 · answer #4 · answered by brandy q 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
George Bush's psychic is not compatible with the post Kofi Anan is occupying at present. Hence answer is No.
2006-11-18 10:17:59 · answer #5 · answered by bashah1939 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well sure why not, most Republicans fall for the lie the UN is useless and George Bush is useless so what the heck
Except the UN isnt useless and Bush is.
2006-11-18 10:28:02 · answer #6 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Isn't the world in a big enough mess already? Are you stark raving mad? I couldn't think of a better candidate for NOT having as a replacement. Quite honestly, I wouldn't trust Bush with the class hamster over the school holidays.
2006-11-18 10:01:34 · answer #7 · answered by mizzsquitz 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
no he wouldn't be a good candidate for anything in politics after his 2 years is up being president .he is the worst politicians or president in USA history
2006-11-18 10:19:32 · answer #8 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
boo to George bbush. What a good way to get the whole world at war.
2006-11-18 10:01:43 · answer #9 · answered by dreamlesssweetheart 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
His replacement has already been named. Do your homework.
2006-11-18 17:45:45 · answer #10 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋