hey taht is smilpy aaimzing. i cluod raed yuor qeutsoin.....
so i gesus it msut be ture.
2006-11-17 23:13:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by buggy 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
i've got under no circumstances heard that, even regardless of the undeniable fact that it sounds logical. this is not a lot that the order of something of the letters would not remember, yet that the human techniques is *particularly* stable at figuring issues out from context ... and the 1st and final letter (enormously the 1st letter) help set the context. They dramatically cut back the style of types your techniques has to contemplate while interpreting the respond. bear in mind that as quickly as you're examining a be conscious, you're no longer sounding it out ... the shown fact that we've a phonetic alphabet is only valuable while we are examining a be conscious whose visual allure we are no longer accustomed to (that's *ALL* words while we are first learning to study). bear in techniques that your occasion isn't as jumbled up because it may look. for occasion in 'erveytihng', you only moved 2 letters (the 'r' and the 'i') ... piece of cake for the human techniques. Had it been 'eenhitvyerg' it could have been slightly greater problematical ... and we could have mandatory greater of the sentence to discern it out. So the intermediate letters are significant too ... however the 1st letter (and to a pair degree the final) is only a *tad* bit greater significant.
2016-12-29 04:38:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by langhorne 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's what I've heard - but it's easier when all the letters are in place, as most truly fast readers recognize entire words rather than patterns.
2006-11-17 23:19:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no need to report it.... it was like solving a word jumble ! I don't know about the letters, but I think we look at the whole word like looking at a picture of anything.
2006-11-17 23:21:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by Scorpius59 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
taht's smilpy the turth
2006-11-17 23:19:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by ur sexy gal 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I thnik yuor rihgt.
2006-11-17 23:26:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by jackie 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
very good! I also read upside down and backwards well
2006-11-17 23:18:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes, that why we can read as fast as we do.
2006-11-17 23:11:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yeah, it could
2006-11-17 23:33:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
yjs
2006-11-17 23:11:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋