English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9 answers

1. Why are you talking about Clinton?

2. Following the USS Cole bombing, Clinton ordered an attack on terrorist camps in Afghanistan and a pharmaceutical plant in Sudan that was thought to be linked to Bin Laden.

3. Since we are talking about past presidents, why didn't Bush Sr take care of Saddam when he did actually have WMDs and invaded Kuwait?

2006-11-17 20:54:49 · answer #1 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 6 1

And GWB nonetheless no longer likely after OBL. What provides? the united statesCole attack is a component of doing employer as a international superpower. The Brits, French, Spanish, Roman empires all have been given remote places forces hit via some wacks right here and there. The FBI and CIA the place in touch, and a symmetric attempt grew to become into put in to the examine. A military specific forces squad grew to become into on call. whether doTerrorism is a criminal offense that has handed off for 1000's of 1000's of years. What did Ronnie Raygun do approximately Beiruit barrack bombing? The FBI and CIA snarled on 9/11. no longer helped via GWB's willfil downgrading for Al-Queda risk in prefer of putting maximum attempt into making waiting for regime changing Iraq. study Richard Clarke.

2016-10-22 07:19:28 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

He did go after terrorist after the Cole attack. Only not as much attention as Bush's policies.

2006-11-17 21:16:53 · answer #3 · answered by Zabanya 6 · 1 0

He did. Apparently this is news to you...

OK, my turn:
Why hasn't Dubya caught Osama yet? And why did Dubya invade Iraq even though they had NO WMDs, NO clear ties to Osama, NO part in the 9/11 attacks, and posed NO immediate threat to the USA?

2006-11-17 21:25:24 · answer #4 · answered by The Man In The Box 6 · 1 0

Naw man, this question is retarded and misguided.

Like askin why didn't bush order an attack on Afghanistan.

It aint a legit question.

2006-11-17 21:13:45 · answer #5 · answered by Its me 4 · 1 1

When will these neocons think beyond Clinton?

2006-11-17 23:30:50 · answer #6 · answered by P P 5 · 2 0

Because he was too busy going after interns.

2006-11-18 10:21:39 · answer #7 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0 1

first,
no guts
second....he felt what america really needed was a good cigar and acted upon that belief.

2006-11-17 21:16:24 · answer #8 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 0 2

he was not interested in iraq oil,and he loves young soldiers live and he not evil

2006-11-17 20:52:37 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

fedest.com, questions and answers