UK streets.. the NHS is bankrupt, new taxes are added everyday, new fines are introduced for non compliance with all the new laws and old age pensioners are going to prison because they cannot afford their council tax ?
2006-11-17 20:38:26 · 13 answers · asked by ? 5 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
They are closing part of my local hospital and the General hospital 10 miles away is going to close permanently.
yet they think its ok to spend OUR money blowing the life out of 1000's of poor Iraqi people & then spending more of OUR money rebuilding the place, the cynicism disgusts me.
2006-11-18 09:10:03 · answer #1 · answered by andylefty 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You might have a valid point about the cost of our involvement in Iraq, but don't you think your exaggerations destroy your credibility?
There are police on UK streets. I saw some last night. Maybe not as many as you'd like.
Every government changes the tax system. What new tax was added yesterday? Thursday? Wednesday?
The NHS is not bankrupt - it has funding decisions to make, and might not be making the ones you want, but it is still treating the majority of us well. A bankrupt company ceases trading altogether.
There is nothing new about fines for non-compliance with laws, old or new.
OAPs are not going to prison because they can't afford their council tax. I bet you can't reference a single one. A small number have been imprisoned for REFUSING to pay council tax over some point of principle, but not being able to afford it has not been the issue.
2006-11-17 20:45:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
What is £100 millions,If it costing tax payers £ tens of millions everytday to keep the army there. GB - He doesn't care tax payers, provide we are all paying tax, that is as far as he concerns. There are more tax waiting to be collected in the future as the new councill tax , road tax, congestion charge(TAX) more for London and other cities (without congestions), miles toll charges. Come on cheer up guys, even if we in the end have to stay at home (can't afford to go out there), we love this country, we love our leader in this government, they are doing their best to spend our money as much as they can, so that they can live confortable in their old age, they won't have to worry about their pensions, they have plenty in the pot. We should be happy in the future watching them happily retired (with 6 figure pensions) in our cold dark little house watching tele eating bread and butter or sometimes with luxurious bean on toast.
2006-11-17 20:53:32 · answer #3 · answered by Lilu 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
apparently the forces of the west have secured peace and stability in the far or close to east. Why they thought that this grew to become into the splendid time to try this's a distinctive remember all jointly. the indisputable fact that there is not any lasting peace in the east isn't significant apparently. the actual reason is the Bilderberg team of which many western leaders which incorporate bush, blair and clinton are individuals. This communities quest for a clean international order, One international government and international autonomy mandatory to stability the ability between the midsection eastern oil manufacturing and that of the mexican or lesser oil generating international places. Oil is the biggest commodity this planet has and any instability between competing manufacturers might have financially shifted the seat of international ability. the present situation with the oil leak in bp`s field and the polishing off of the armed profession of the midsection and close to east is barely the top of the iceberg. BP are ploughing tens of millions into their south american operation. The assertion of obtainable further exploration in the north sea is further evidence of the ability oil holds.
2016-10-22 07:19:13 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Conscience money as the Blair(may his black soul burn in Hell) government helped the evil one across the Atlantic destroy Iraq.
You are obviously right in principle - this country should never have committed money and armed forces to a war that was for the benefit of the US and Israel.
2006-11-17 21:20:32 · answer #5 · answered by Clive 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We have a moral duty with regards to Iraq. With regards to OAP's going to prison, they are sent there as a last resort when they refuse to pay not necessarily because they can't pay!
2006-11-17 20:55:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Gordon Browns a muppet and he is obviously as blind as his counterpart David Blunkett.What goes around comes around,he will need money himself one day.
2006-11-17 20:53:22 · answer #7 · answered by Nikki 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oligarchy better! You know now and proselytize! Team player yeah!!
Antenna snaps off
Cyclone kills television
Interaction thrives
Good question that you ask and you get many points! old fashion html Haiku make it stronger!
You expert pixel killer. Our awe is now complete and have breakfast.
2006-11-17 21:52:03 · answer #8 · answered by Minmi 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It doesn't matter about our old aged pensioners!! they are meaningless to our society, they've done their bit years ago, but we have forgot about that now.
We need to be taxed more and more, Iraq is our number one priority now, we need to raise lots more money for them.
BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH!!!!
2006-11-17 20:55:11 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Just another drop in the Ocean my friend
but i suppose he has to make it look like we are still trying to help
before we just run away and leave them to fend for themselves
2006-11-17 20:41:15 · answer #10 · answered by reevesy314 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋