thought about tna?

Question

me personally, i think that tna has some good talent but when i watch it, it just feel sorta low rent, cheap. the (entrance) music sucks and i hate the comentators, nobody has any real charisma. dont get me wrong they have some good wrestling but not a whole lotta entertainment. i think wwe is better because of that reason and wil always be better for that reason. i also think that Viny Mac has his hands in tna, ie. kurt anle, monty brown vkm Vs vkm. just seems a little fishy to me.

Answer 1

It's not that entertaining.The wrestlers maybe good at wrestling but they have low mic skills.I agree with you that their entrance sucks,the commentators are lousy.I also think that Vince might be a major shareholder in TNA.(V)oodoo (K)in (M)afia vs (V)incent (K)ennedy (M)cmahon does seem suspicious or is it just a coincidence?

Answer 2

TNA is not a billion dollar company. They are not owned(associated, affiliated or anything-else-ated with Ted Turner or any other billionaire!) I can remember a time when the WWWF(World Wide Wrestling Federation) was low rent and cheap as compared to The NWA(National Wrestling Alliance.) While the McMahon's(Vince's father) and partners were promoting shows only in the northeast, The NWA had territories all around the world(US, Auatralia, Japan, etc.) The biggest and best thing about TNA is that it is AN ALTERNATIVE(same as The ORIGINAL ECW) to the wwe. Yes, it does have some talent(which Vince tries to buy from every other federation so that he can keep his own monster fueled) and some of that talent will go to other federations, but overall, it's interesting to watch.

Answer 3

Yea.. I Agree With Your Opinion..
The Entrance Music Sucks And I Hate The Comentators too ..
They Has A Good Wrestler Such As Aj Styles , Kurt Angle, Jeff Jarett, Samoe Joe ..

Answer 4

Let me say just this: tna is trying hard to compete with the wweand i seriously doubt they are in ties with the wwe. If they were , then tna would be another crappy brand extension of the wwe. I'm glad tna has more wrestling than anything. Nowadays wwe just throws money everywhere and it's getting them nowhere.

Answer 5

I wouldn't be surprised if Vince McMahon has part ownership in TNA. I watched the 2 hour debut of TNA and I wasn't all that impressed, to me the WWE is better. TNA should have had all the big names wrestling for their 2 hour debut, it would have been better.

Answer 6

I like the fact its a little more hardcore than wwe,the 6sided barbed wire cage match between rhino and christian was good thursday night.I think vince owns the word wrestleing.
Id like to see wrestleing go back to the first days of ECW,that was hardcore.

Answer 7

I watch TNA, and part of me feels that its a WWE wanna-be. People use i as a stepping stone to the WWE (Monty Brown recently signed with WWE) or down from it (Christian).

Quite a few of the ideas are "borrowed" from the WWE (recently the barbed wire steel cage watch Christian Cage vs Rhino - barbed wire steel cage JBL vs Big Show).

Answer 8

I think TNA is still new and trying to get better. I agree with you they have some good talent. I think within a year they will be almost as good as the WWE.

Answer 9

It's not cheap because TNA is funded by a billion dollar company(Panda Energy International)but TNA watch what they spend their money on.WWE just throws their money on anything and that's why they are losing money fast and because of that WWE can't afford any good matches anymore.....unlike TNA.
TNA!!! TNA!!! TNA!!!

Answer 10

I agree. TNA reminds me of WCW, where they have tremendous young talent, that will never get used properly. You have the likes of Petey Williams, Sonjay Dutt, Samoa Joe etc. that will never crack the main event and stay there. Instead they will continue to push Sting, Jarrett when he returns, and Abyss