English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I am ref.to comment on British Cricketer Monty Panesar by the AUSSY FANS &asking the Q myself Why such remarks by Aussies? I am A PROUDDDDDDDDD INDIAN hense asking why Monty was called "stupid indian"?

2006-11-17 16:54:08 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Cricket

15 answers

australians are known to be very rude
they themselves had many racial abuses amongst themselves in their own country which had resulted in a war of abuses 2 years back leave it aside that monty panesar is an indian
the australian crowd just needs a player from the opponents team that can be abused
they target atleast one player from every team eg.murali from sri lanka
they had called him a chukker
actually monty must not pay attention to all these abuses he must show that he is a CIVILISED INDIAN and not a person of the third world

2006-11-17 17:31:54 · answer #1 · answered by ♦ arc duke ♦ 3 · 0 0

If you want to retaliate, next time you see some Australians, do NOT show them any politeness (usually Indians show too much respect to foreigners, particularly the white ones, ask Kiran More !) ...

It was Ganguly's brand of 'paying the Brits back in their own coins' when he took off his shirt at the Lords' balcony after winning the Natwest Final in 2002 (Flintoff did something very similar at the Wankhade Stadium in 2001-2002) ...

We need a few tough guys like Arjuna Ranatunga and Sourav Ganguly who could give back to these so-called civilized westerners as good as they got ...

2006-11-18 03:03:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Seriously. Get over it. If he was called a "Stupid Pom" "Stupid Brit" "Stupid Slow Bowler" no one would care, yet he is a Pom, a Brit and a slow bowler. Unless I am mistaken he is Indian too.
Calling someone stupid isn't racist. From the way everyone is carrying on, it seems even calling someone "Indian" is racist.

Why do Aussie's tease and jibe and rip the piss, because we like getting reactions. Just ask Andre Nel.

2006-11-18 19:51:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

yes its really against indians when compared to indian community but refering to south african community its not why because they only know about their thing not ours that's why monty panesar was called 'stupid indian' by seeing dress code hair style and body language

2006-11-18 01:02:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

People call each other all kinds of names the world over. Nothing to get het up about. In fact name calling tells you more about the people calling the names than the ones being called the names.

2006-11-19 03:10:28 · answer #5 · answered by ~ 3 · 0 0

No need to raise such a ruckus on small things like these.I'm saying this bcoz Panessar has nothing to complain about,So why should we worry?

2006-11-17 19:08:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

this is so humiliating .may be they are refering to indian way of playing cricket.they should stop comments like this.PROUD TO BE AN INDIAN

2006-11-17 17:25:10 · answer #7 · answered by rocky 1 · 0 0

Such remarks are absolutely uncalled for and are very indecent.

2006-11-17 17:21:19 · answer #8 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0 0

I guess Britishers don't like Sikh Indians... more over they think they are not so intelligent...

They are treated badly in UK...

2006-11-17 22:52:12 · answer #9 · answered by Prasanna Venkatesh 1 · 0 1

Its against hindus and indians (poor) my dear

2006-11-17 21:34:50 · answer #10 · answered by Mohommad Hafeez 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers